首页> 外文期刊>International review of intellectual property and competition law >Comment on 'Metalco' - 'Top-Tier Design', Copyright Protection, and the Assessment of the 'Artistic Value' Requirement Under Italian Law
【24h】

Comment on 'Metalco' - 'Top-Tier Design', Copyright Protection, and the Assessment of the 'Artistic Value' Requirement Under Italian Law

机译:评论“ Metalco”-“顶层设计”,版权保护以及意大利法律对“艺术价值”要求的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Everybody sees that defining "artistic value" is not just a problem of interpretation, but one of policy: because the design system does not offer protection to designs of commercial success for longer than 25 years, undertakings look for proprietary protection under copyright law, and courts are sensitive to the matter. Still, a stricter test would be preferable even for policy reasons, as a narrower interpretation of the concept of artistic value would limit the revival of IP protection for industrial designs, with lower risks for the investments of competitors that lawfully start to reproduce three-dimensional shapes when they are in the public domain.
机译:每个人都认为,定义“艺术价值”不仅是解释问题,而且是政策之一:因为设计系统在超过25年的时间里都没有为商业成功的设计提供保护,因此企业在版权法下寻求专有保护,并且法院对此事很敏感。尽管如此,即使出于政策原因,更严格的测试还是可取的,因为对艺术价值概念的狭义解释将限制工业品外观设计的IP保护的复兴,而合法开始复制三维作品的竞争者的投资则具有较低的风险。它们在公共领域时的形状。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号