首页> 外文期刊>IIC:International review of intellectual property and competition law >New Rights or New Business Models? An Inquiry into the Future of Publishing in the Digital Era
【24h】

New Rights or New Business Models? An Inquiry into the Future of Publishing in the Digital Era

机译:新权利还是新业务模式?数字时代出版的未来探讨

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In its Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, the European Commission included a new neighbouring right for press publishers with regard to the digital use of their publications "to ensure quality journalism and citizens' access to information." (European Commission, 14 September 2016, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, Doc. COM(2016) 593 final, Art. 11(1) and Recital 31.) Undoubtedly, a free and pluralist press is one of the cornerstones of democratic societies. The question is, however, whether this goal can be achieved by adopting an additional layer of protection. From an economic perspective, it seems essential that publishers, including press publishers, develop new business models in the digital environment. To ensure the survival of quality journalism, it is of utmost importance to support the transition to new business models that has already started in the publishing sector. Hence, the question arises whether the proposal of a new neighbouring right is a legislative initiative that makes sense against this background. To answer this question, the following inquiry will first provide an economic analysis of new business models in the publishing industry. On this basis, it becomes possible to assess the proposal of a new neighbouring right in the light of the need to develop new business models that are sustainable in the digital environment. The analysis will show that the introduction of a new neighbouring right is unlikely to offer support in this respect. Instead, it may even impede or delay necessary modernization steps.
机译:欧盟委员会在其“关于在数字单一市场中版权的指令的提案”中,包括了对新闻出版商的出版物数字化使用的一项新的邻接权,“以确保高质量的新闻报道和公民对信息的获取”。 (欧洲委员会,2016年9月14日,欧洲议会和理事会关于数字单一市场中版权的指令提案,COM(2016)593号文件,决赛,第11(1)条和第31条。)毫无疑问,自由和多元化的新闻界是民主社会的基石之一。但是,问题是,是否可以通过采用附加保护层来实现此目标。从经济角度来看,包括新闻出版商在内的出版商在数字环境中开发新的业务模型似乎至关重要。为了确保高质量新闻的生存,至关重要的是支持向出版业已经开始的新商业模式过渡。因此,提出了一个新的邻接权的提议是否是在这种背景下有意义的立法倡议的问题。为了回答这个问题,下面的询问将首先对出版业中的新商业模式进行经济分析。在此基础上,有可能根据需要开发在数字环境中可持续的新业务模型来评估新相邻权的提议。分析将表明,引入新的邻接权不太可能在这方面提供支持。相反,它甚至可能阻碍或延迟必要的现代化步骤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号