...
首页> 外文期刊>International review of intellectual property and competition law >Customer Ratings on Amazon (Kundenbewertungen auf Amazon)
【24h】

Customer Ratings on Amazon (Kundenbewertungen auf Amazon)

机译:亚马逊的客户评级(亚马逊的客户评论)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

a) The supplier of a product offered on the online trading platform Amazon is not liable under competition law for customer ratings not occasioned by that supplier if it does not adopt these ratings as its own. For the assessment of whether a person against whom a claim of anticompetitive advertising is raised adopts others' statements as their own, a crucial factor is whether that person in an outwardly evident manner assumes responsibility for the contents of others' statements or creates the imputable impression of identifying with them. This standard is also applicable in therapeutics advertising law. b) Whether the offering on the online trading platform Amazon establishes a guarantor status with the legal obligation to prevent a deception via customer ratings is determined by the circumstances of the concrete individual case and requires a weighing assessment. c) In the course of this assessment it must be considered that customer ratings systems on online trading platforms are societally desirable and enjoy protection under constitutional law. The interest of consumers in commenting on products and, prior to purchase, obtaining or exchanging information about characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of a product from different sources, among them the ratings of other customers, is protected by the freedom of opinion and information enshrined in Art.5(1), first sentence, of the Basic Law. Where an offer concerns medicinal products or medical devices, however, it can be necessary to take the protected legal interest of public health into consideration in this assessment. d) If the supplier of a product offered for sale on an online trading platform itself issues misleading or falsified customer ratings or pays for them, or if they can for other reasons be attributed to the supplier as advertising, that supplier is liable as offender, or as the case may be, joint offender, in a competition-law violation.
机译:a)在网上交易平台上提供的产品的供应商亚马逊在竞争法中对客户评级的竞争法不承担任何责任,如果它没有作为自己的评级未采用这些评级。为了评估是否举办了反竞争广告索赔的人,提高了其他人的陈述作为自己的陈述,一个关键因素是该人是否以外观明显的方式对他人的陈述的内容承担责任或创造不可阻力的印象与他们识别。本标准也适用于治疗型广告法。 b)在网上交易平台上的产品是否建立了担保人身份,通过法律义务来防止通过客户评级欺骗是由具体个人案件的情况决定的,并且需要称重评估。 c)在本评估过程中,必须考虑在线交易平台上的客户评级系统是在宪法法律下的社会理想的,并享有保护。消费者在评论产品中的利益,并在购买之前,获取或交换有关来自不同来源的产品的特征,优缺点的信息,其中包括其他客户的评级,受到在中断的意见自由和信息的保护第5(1),第一句,基本法。然而,如果提供涉及药用产品或医疗设备,则可能需要在本评估中考虑公共卫生的受保护的法律利益。 d)如果在网上交易平台上出售产品的供应商本身发出误导或伪造的客户评级或为他们支付,或者如果他们因其他原因归因于供应商作为广告,那么供应商责任为罪犯,或者,根据竞争法违规的联合罪犯。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号