首页> 外文期刊>IEEJ energy journal >Comparative Economics of Hydrogen and Carbon-neutral Methane Blending into the Existing City Gas Network
【24h】

Comparative Economics of Hydrogen and Carbon-neutral Methane Blending into the Existing City Gas Network

机译:氢气和碳中性甲烷混合到现有城市气体网络的比较经济学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study evaluated decarbonization impact and cost of hydrogen blending and carbon-neutral methane (CN methane)blending into the existing city gas network. These two gases are produced from renewable energy. Larger scale of variablerenewables deployment allows to curb the scale of facilities like electrolyzer and methanation and can reduce CO2abatements cost in both cases. Decarbonization impact of hydrogen blending is limited, though the CO2 abatement cost issmaller than CN methane blending. On the other hand, CO2 abatement cost of CN methane is higher than hydrogenblending, though CN methane blending can bring about larger decarbonization impact on the city gas network. These resultscome from the fact that hydrogen blending can receive the benefit in using the existing infrastructure that is regarded as anadvantage inherent to CN methane. However, it should be noted that in reality blending hydrogen or CN methane into citygas causes adjustment of calorie and combustion performance in equipment at consumers, and the adjustment cost incurredby hydrogen blending is supposed to be much higher than CN methane blending. This factor will be included in the futurestudies.
机译:该研究评估了脱碳的影响和氢共混和碳中性甲烷的成本(CN甲烷)将进入现有的城市天然气网络。这两个气体由可再生能量产生。更大的变量可再生能源部署允许抑制电解器和甲烷化等设施的规模,可以减少二氧化碳两种情况下的减少费用。碳化碳化的影响是有限的,尽管CO 2减排成本是有限的小于Cn甲烷混合。另一方面,CN甲烷的CO 2减排成本高于氢混合,但Cn甲烷混合可以为城市气体网络带来更大的脱碳影响。这些结果来自氢混合可以在利用被认为是一个被视为一个人的基础设施获得益处CN甲烷固有的优势。但是,应该注意的是,在现实中将氢或CN甲烷混合到城市中气体导致消费者设备中的卡路里和燃烧性能调整,调整成本通过氢共混应该远高于Cn甲烷混合。这个因素将在未来纳入学习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号