...
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing >Information Retrieval and Processing in Sensor Networks: Deterministic Scheduling Versus Random Access
【24h】

Information Retrieval and Processing in Sensor Networks: Deterministic Scheduling Versus Random Access

机译:传感器网络中的信息检索和处理:确定性调度与随机访问

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We investigate the effect of medium-access control (MAC) used in information retrieval by a mobile access point (AP) on information processing in large-scale sensor network, where sensors are unreliable and subject to outage. We focus on a 1-D sensor network and assume that the location information is available locally at each sensor and unavailable to the AP. For a fixed collection interval, two types of MAC schemes are considered: the deterministic scheduling, which collects data from predetermined sensors locations, and random access, which collects data from random locations. We compare the signal estimation performance of the two MACs, using the expected maximum distortion as the performance measure. For large sensor networks with fixed density, we show that there is a critical threshold on the sensor outage probability Pout-For _Pout < e-lambda(1+o(1)), where lambda is the throughput of the random access protocol, the deterministic scheduling provides better reconstruction performance. However, for Pout > e-lambda(1+o(1)), the performance degradation from missing data samples due to sensor outage does not justify the effort of scheduling; simple random access outperforms the optimal scheduling.
机译:我们调查了移动访问点(AP)在信息检索中使用的媒体访问控制(MAC)对大规模传感器网络中信息处理的影响,在该网络中传感器不可靠且容易中断。我们专注于一维传感器网络,并假设位置信息在每个传感器本地可用,而对AP不可用。对于固定的收集间隔,考虑两种类型的MAC方案:确定性调度(从预定的传感器位置收集数据)和随机访问(从随机位置收集数据)。我们使用预期的最大失真作为性能指标,比较了两个MAC的信号估计性能。对于具有固定密度的大型传感器网络,我们证明了传感器中断概率Pout-For _Pout e-lambda(1 + o(1)),由于传感器故障而导致数据样本丢失而导致的性能下降并不能证明调度工作的合理性。简单随机访问的性能优于最佳调度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号