首页> 外文期刊>Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on >Comparison Between BEM and Classical FEM for a 3D Low-Frequency Eddy-Current Analysis
【24h】

Comparison Between BEM and Classical FEM for a 3D Low-Frequency Eddy-Current Analysis

机译:BEM与经典FEM的3D低频涡流分析比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this paper, we are concerned with eddy-current analysis based on fast boundary element methods (BEM). A novel compression and preconditioning technique, adaptive cross approximation, is used to benefit from several advantages when computing problems with highly permeable materials. Several numerical experiments have been performed with the aim to investigate the performance compared to finite element solvers. The results are validated on the TEAM benchmark problem P21.
机译:在本文中,我们关注基于快速边界元方法(BEM)的涡流分析。在计算高渗透性材料的问题时,一种新颖的压缩和预处理技术(自适应交叉逼近)可从多个优点中受益。为了研究与有限元求解器相比的性能,已经进行了一些数值实验。在TEAM基准问题P21上验证了结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号