首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Magnetics >Performance of different vector potential formulations in solving multiply connected 3-D eddy current problems
【24h】

Performance of different vector potential formulations in solving multiply connected 3-D eddy current problems

机译:不同矢量势公式在解决多重连接的3-D涡流问题中的性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The authors describe their numerical experiences in applying FEM (finite-element method) solution techniques to a 3-D (three-dimensional) eddy-current problem with a coil-driven multiply connected conductor, the benchmark problem No.7 of the International TEAM Workshops. Several formulations have been tried using a magnetic vector and electric scalar potential or an electric vector and a magnetic scalar in the conductor and a magnetic vector or scalar potential outside. The problem has been solved at two frequencies. The authors briefly describe the formulations used and compare the performance. Magnetic field and current density plots are also compared. The advantages and disadvantages of the various versions are pointed out. The use of a magnetic scalar potential H rather than a magnetic vector potential A outside the conductor and the hole substantially reduces the number of degrees of freedom and thus the computational effort. The versions using it in the conductor yield relatively ill-conditioned systems. Also, at the higher frequency, the conditioning deteriorates considerably.
机译:作者描述了他们在将有限元方法求解技术应用于带有线圈驱动的多连接导体的3-D(三维)涡流问题时的数值经验,这是国际TEAM的基准问题7。讲习班。已经尝试了使用导体中的磁矢量和电标量电势或导体中的电矢量和磁标量以及外部的磁矢量或标量电势的几种公式。该问题已在两个频率上得到解决。作者简要描述了所用的配方并比较了性能。还比较了磁场和电流密度图。指出了各种版本的优缺点。使用导体和孔外部的标量磁势H而不是磁矢量势A会大大减少自由度的数量,从而减少计算量。在导体中使用它的版本会产生条件较差的系统。同样,在较高的频率下,调节会大大恶化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号