首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing >Impact of the New ERA5 Reanalysis in the Computation of Radar Altimeter Wet Path Delays
【24h】

Impact of the New ERA5 Reanalysis in the Computation of Radar Altimeter Wet Path Delays

机译:新的ERA5重新分析对雷达高度计湿路径延迟计算的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Satellite altimetry allows the estimation of accurate water surface heights only with accurate determination of all involved terms, namely, the wet tropospheric correction (WTC) or its symmetric value, the wet path delay (WPD). WPD is best determined from onboard microwave radiometer (MWR) measurements; however, the corresponding WPD retrievals become invalid close to land (e.g., coastal and inland waters). Alternative WPD sources are numerical weather models (NWMs), e.g., from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). NWMs provide the parameters at 6-h intervals; however, ERA5 (the latest ECMWF reanalysis) provides hourly atmospheric parameters at 0.25 degrees x 0.125 degrees. Motivated by this new and improved temporal resolution, the focus of this paper is the global assessment of the impact of different temporal resolutions of ERA5 in the WPD computation. The same assessment is also performed concerning the spatial resolution of ERA5 and operational models. Aiming to identify the best compromise between spatial/temporal resolutions, accuracy, and computational time, WPDs computed using various combinations of these resolutions were inter-compared and compared with MWR-derived WPD. The results show that the global root mean square (RMS) of the differences between MWR and ERA5 is 1.2 cm and the effect of using 1-h intervals instead of 6-h intervals is small, significant only for latitudes 30 degrees-60 degrees S and 30 degrees-60 degrees N. Hourly intervals do not have a significant impact on the WPD from ERA5, being a temporal resolution of 3 h high enough to ensure the same accuracy of 1 h, showing that ERA5 cannot map the WPD short space and time scales.
机译:卫星测高仪仅在对所有相关项(即对流层湿校正(WTC)或其对称值,湿路径时延(WPD))进行精确确定的情况下,才能估算出准确的水面高度。 WPD最好由机载微波辐射计(MWR)测量确定;但是,相应的WPD取回在土地附近(例如沿海和内陆水域)变得无效。 WPD的替代来源是数值天气模型(NWM),例如来自欧洲中距离天气预报中心(ECMWF)。 NWM每隔6小时提供一次参数;但是,ERA5(最新的ECMWF重新分析)提供了每小时0.25度x 0.125度的大气参数。由于这种新的和改进的时间分辨率,本文的重点是对ERA5的不同时间分辨率在WPD计算中的影响进行全局评估。还对ERA5的空间分辨率和操作模型进行了相同的评估。为了确定空间/时间分辨率,准确性和计算时间之间的最佳折衷,将使用这些分辨率的各种组合计算出的WPD进行了比较,并与MWR派生的WPD进行了比较。结果表明,MWR和ERA5之间的差异的全局均方根(RMS)为1.2 cm,使用1小时间隔而不是6小时间隔的效果很小,仅在纬度为30度至60度时有效每小时间隔不会对ERA5的WPD产生重大影响,时间间隔为3 h,足以确保1 h的相同精度,这表明ERA5无法映射WPD短空间和时间尺度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号