...
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE transactions on circuits and systems . I , Regular papers >Comparison of Pentacene and Amorphous Silicon AMOLED Display Driver Circuits
【24h】

Comparison of Pentacene and Amorphous Silicon AMOLED Display Driver Circuits

机译:并五苯和非晶硅AMOLED显示驱动器电路的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Organic light-emitting diode (OLED) displays offer distinct advantages over liquid crystal displays for portable electronics applications, including light weight, high brightness, low power consumption, wide viewing angle, and low processing costs. They also are attractive candidates for highly flexible substrates. In active-matrix OLED (AMOLED) displays, a small transistor circuit is used to drive each OLED device. This paper compares the simulated performance of two state-of-the-art AMOLED drivers with a proposed 5 thin-film-transistor (TFT) voltage programmed driver circuit which combines the advantages of the first two configurations. A competitive evaluation is also done between amorphous silicon (alpha-Si) and organic TFTs (OTFTs,) using comparable empirical device models for alpha-Si) and pentacene OTFTs. The 5-TFT circuit is found to match the speed of the 2-TFT while achieving a stability closer to the 4-TFT circuits and demonstrating a better speed-stability tradeoff.
机译:有机发光二极管(OLED)显示器相对于便携式电子应用的液晶显示器具有明显的优势,包括重量轻,亮度高,功耗低,视角宽和处理成本低。它们也是高度柔性基材的有吸引力的候选材料。在有源矩阵OLED(AMOLED)显示器中,小型晶体管电路用于驱动每个OLED器件。本文将两种最先进的AMOLED驱动器的仿真性能与建议的5薄膜晶体管(TFT)电压编程驱动器电路进行了比较,该电路结合了前两种配置的优点。使用可比的经验器件模型(α-Si)和并五苯OTFT,在非晶硅(α-Si)和有机TFT(OTFT)之间也进行了竞争性评估。发现5-TFT电路与2-TFT的速度匹配,同时实现了更接近于4-TFT电路的稳定性,并显示了更好的速度稳定性折衷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号