首页> 外文期刊>ICES Journal of Marine Science >Do tagging experiments tell the truth? Using electronic tags to evaluate conventional tagging data
【24h】

Do tagging experiments tell the truth? Using electronic tags to evaluate conventional tagging data

机译:标记实验能说明事实吗?使用电子标签评估常规标签数据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For more than a century, scientists have used mark-recapture techniques to describe the spatial dynamics of marine demersal fish species in the North Sea. Although such experiments have provided extensive data sets, the information is limited to the date and position at release and at recapture. Furthermore, these data may be biased due to the distribution of fishing effort. Recently, electronic (archival) data storage tags (DSTs) have successfully been used to reconstruct the movements of free-ranging demersal fish between release and recapture. Data from DST experiments allow the calculation of fisheries-independent migration parameters, and thereby provide a means of evaluating conventional tagging data. We compared the migration patterns of North Sea plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) as inferred from a database of twentieth century conventional tagging experiments (CT), with data from 132 plaice tagged with DST. In general, the CT experiments allowed a reliable interpretation of migration patterns, although for certain release areas the migration distances were biased due to the heterogeneous distribution of fishing effort.
机译:一个多世纪以来,科学家一直使用标记捕获技术来描述北海海洋沉没鱼类的空间动态。尽管此类实验提供了广泛的数据集,但信息仅限于发布和重新捕获时的日期和位置。此外,由于捕捞努力的分布,这些数据可能会有偏差。近来,电子(档案)数据存储标签(DST)已成功用于重构释放和重新捕获之间自由放养的水下鱼类的运动。来自DST实验的数据允许计算与渔业无关的迁移参数,从而提供评估常规标签数据的方法。我们比较了从20世纪常规标记实验(CT)数据库推断出的北海(Pleuronectes platesa L.)的迁移模式,以及来自132个用DST标记的的数据。通常,CT实验可以可靠地解释迁移模式,尽管对于某些释放区域,迁移距离由于捕捞努力的不均匀分布而存在偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号