首页> 外文期刊>Hydrological sciences journal >Comparative evaluation of statistical tests for time series analysis: application to hydrological time series
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of statistical tests for time series analysis: application to hydrological time series

机译:时间序列分析统计测试的比较评估:在水文时间序列中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Statistical analyses of hydrological time series play a vital role in water resources studies. Twenty-nine statistical tests for detecting time series characteristics were evaluated by applying them to analyse 46 years of annual rainfall, 47 years of 1 -day maximum rainfall and consecutive 2-, 3-, 4-, 5- and 6-day maximum rainfalls at Kharagpur, West Bengal, India. The performance of all the tests was evaluated. No severe outliers were found, and both the annual and maximum rainfall series were found to be normally distributed. Based on the known physical parameters affecting the homogeneity, the cumulative deviations and the Bayesian tests were found to be superior to the classical von Neumann test. Similarly, the Tukey test proved excellent among all the multiple comparison tests. These tests indicated that all the seven rainfall series are homogeneous. Two parametric t tests and the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test indicated stationarity in all the rainfall series. Of 12 trend detection tests, nine tests indicated no trends in the rainfall series. The Kendall's Rank Correlation test and the Mann-Kendall test were found equally powerful. Moreover, the Fourier series analysis revealed no apparent periodicities in all the seven rainfall series. The annual rainfall series was found persistent with a time lag of nine years. All the rainfall series were subjected to stochastic analysis by fitting 35 autoregressive moving-average (ARMA) models of different orders. The best-fit models for the original annual rainfall and 1-, 2- and 3-day maximum rainfall series were found to be ARMA(0,4), ARMA(0,2), ARMA(0,2) and ARMA(3,0), respectively. The best-fit model for the logarithmically transformed 4-day maximum rainfall was found to be ARMA(0,2). However, for the inversely transformed 4-, 5- and 6-day maximum rainfall series, ARMA(0,1) was obtained as the best-fit model. It is concluded that proper selection of time series tests and use of several tests is indispensable for making useful and reliable decisions.
机译:水文时间序列的统计分析在水资源研究中起着至关重要的作用。评估了29种用于检测时间序列特征的统计测试,方法是将它们用于分析46年的年降雨量,47年的1天最大降雨量以及连续的2、3、4、5和6天最大降雨量在印度西孟加拉邦的Kharagpur。评价所有测试的性能。没有发现严重的异常值,并且发现年度和最大降雨序列均呈正态分布。基于影响均匀性的已知物理参数,发现累积偏差和贝叶斯检验优于经典的冯·诺依曼检验。同样,在所有多个比较测试中,Tukey测试都被证明是出色的。这些测试表明,所有七个降雨序列都是均匀的。两次参数t检验和非参数Mann-Whitney检验表明在所有降雨序列中都是平稳的。在12个趋势检测测试中,有9个测试表明降雨序列没有趋势。发现Kendall的秩相关检验和Mann-Kendall检验同样有效。此外,傅里叶级数分析表明在所有七个降雨序列中都没有明显的周期性。发现年降水量序列持续时间为九年。通过拟合35个不同阶数的自回归移动平均(ARMA)模型,对所有降雨序列进行了随机分析。发现原始年降雨量以及1天,2天和3天最大降雨量序列的最佳拟合模型是ARMA(0,4),ARMA(0,2),ARMA(0,2)和ARMA( 3,0)。经对数转换的4天最大降雨量的最佳拟合模型为ARMA(0,2)。然而,对于4、5和6天的最大降雨量序列进行逆变换,获得了ARMA(0,1)作为最佳拟合模型。结论是,正确选择时间序列测试和使用多个测试对于做出有用且可靠的决策是必不可少的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号