...
首页> 外文期刊>Hydrological ProcHydrological Processesrnesses >Quantifying contributions to storm runoff through end‐member mixing analysis and hydrologic measurements at the Panola Mountain Research Watershed (Georgia, USA)
【24h】

Quantifying contributions to storm runoff through end‐member mixing analysis and hydrologic measurements at the Panola Mountain Research Watershed (Georgia, USA)

机译:通过Panola山研究流域(美国乔治亚州)的最终成员混合分析和水文测量,量化对暴雨径流的贡献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The geographic sources and hydrologic flow paths of stormflow in small catchments are not well understood because of limitations in sampling methods and insufficient resolution of potential end members. To address these limitations, an extensive hydrologic dataset was collected at a 10 ha catchment at Panola Mountain Research Watershed near Atlanta, GA, to quantify the contribution of three geographic sources of stormflow. Samples of stream water, runoff from an outcrop, and hillslope subsurface stormflow were collected during two rainstorms in the winter of 1996, and an end-member mixing analysis model that included five solutes was developed. Runoff from the outcrop, which occupies about one-third of the catchment area, contributed 50–55% of the peak streamflow during the 2 February rainstorm, and 80–85% of the peak streamflow during the 6–7 March rainstorm; it also contributed about 50% to total streamflow during the dry winter conditions that preceded the 6–7 March storm. Riparian groundwater runoff was the largest component of stream runoff (80–100%) early during rising streamflow and throughout stream recession, and contributed about 50% to total stream runoff during the 2 February storm, which was preceded by wet winter conditions. Hillslope runoff contributed 25–30% to peak stream runoff and 15–18% to total stream runoff during both storms. The temporal response of the three runoff components showed general agreement with hydrologic measurements from the catchment during each storm. Estimates of recharge from the outcrop to the riparian aquifer that were independent of model calculations indicated that storage in the riparian aquifer could account for the volume of rain that fell on the outcrop but did not contribute to stream runoff. The results of this study generally indicate that improvements in the ability of mixing models to describe the hydrologic response accurately in forested catchments may depend on better identification, and detailed spatial and temporal characterization of the mobile waters from the principal hydrologic source areas that contribute to stream runoff. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:由于采样方法的局限性和潜在末端成员的分辨率不足,人们对小流域暴雨的地理来源和水文流动路径了解得很少。为了解决这些局限性,在佐治亚州亚特兰大附近的Panola山研究流域的10公顷流域收集了一个广泛的水文数据集,以量化三种暴雨地理来源的贡献。在1996年冬季的两次暴雨中,收集了溪流水,露头径流和山坡地下暴雨的样本,并建立了包含五种溶质的末端成员混合分析模型。露头的径流约占集水面积的三分之一,在2月2日的暴雨中占峰值流量的50-55%,在3月6-7日的暴雨中占峰值流量的80-85%;在3月6日至7日暴风雨来临之前的干旱冬季,它也为总流量贡献了约50%。在河水流量上升和整个河水衰退的初期,河岸地下水径流是河水径流的最大组成部分(80–100%),在2月2日的暴风雨(冬季潮湿)之前,河水径流对总河水径流的贡献约为50%。两次暴风雨期间,坡坡径流对高峰径流的贡献为25–30%,对总径流的贡献为15–18%。在每次暴风雨中,三个径流分量的时间响应与汇水区的水文测量结果基本一致。与模型计算无关的从露头到河岸含水层补给量的估算表明,在河岸含水层中的存储可以解释掉在露头上的雨水量,但不会造成河流径流。这项研究的结果总体上表明,混合模型准确描述森林流域水文响应能力的提高可能取决于更好的识别,以及主要水文源区对河道有贡献的流动水的详细时空特征。径流。版权所有©2001 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号