...
首页> 外文期刊>Hydrological Processes >Assessment of hydrodynamic simulation results for eco-hydraulic and eco-hydrological applications: a spatial semivariance approach
【24h】

Assessment of hydrodynamic simulation results for eco-hydraulic and eco-hydrological applications: a spatial semivariance approach

机译:评估生态水力和生态水文应用的水动力模拟结果:一种空间半方差方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Output from a three-dimensional numerical flow model (SS1IM) is used in conjunction with high-resolution topographic and velocity data to assess such models for eco-hydraulic applications in river channel design and habitat appraisal. A new methodology for the comparison between field measurement and model output is detailed. This involves a comparison between conventional goodness-of-fit approaches applied to a spatially structured (riffle and pool) sample of model and field data, and a 'relaxation' method based upon the spatial semivariance of model/field departures. Conventional assessment indicates that the model predicts point-by-point velocity characteristics on a 0.45 m mesh to within ±0.1 m s~(-1) over 80% of the channel area at low flow, and 50% of the area at high in-bank flow. When a relative criterion of model fit is used, however, the model appears to perform less well: 60-70% of channel area has predicted velocities that depart from observed velocities by more than 10%. Regression analysis of observed and predicted velocities gives more cause for optimism, but all of these conventional indicators of goodness of fit neglect important spatial characteristics of model performance. Spatial semivariance is a means of supplementing model appraisal in this respect. In particular, using the relaxation approach, results are greatly improved: at a high in-bank flow, the model results match field measurements to within 0.1 m s~(-1) for more than 95% of the total channel area, provided that model and field comparisons are allowed within a radius of approximately 1 m from the original point of measurement. It is suggested that this revised form of model assessment is of particular relevance to eco-hydraulic applications, where some degree of spatial and temporal dynamism (or uncertainty) is a characteristic. The approach may also be generalized to other environmental science modelling applications where the spatial attributes of model fits are of interest.
机译:三维数值流模型(SS1IM)的输出与高分辨率地形和速度数据结合使用,以评估此类模型在河道设计和栖息地评估中用于生态液压应用。详细介绍了一种用于现场测量和模型输出之间比较的新方法。这涉及到比较应用于模型和现场数据的空间结构化(浅滩和游泳池)样本的传统​​拟合优度方法与基于模型/现场偏离的空间半方差的“放松”方法之间的比较。传统评估表明,该模型预测在低流量下80%的通道面积和高流量下50%的通道面积上0.45 m网格的点到点速度特性在±0.1 ms〜(-1)以内。银行流量。但是,当使用模型拟合的相对标准时,该模型的表现似乎不太好:通道面积的60-70%的预测速度与观察到的速度相差10%以上。对观测速度和预测速度的回归分析使人们更加乐观,但是所有这些拟合优度的常规指标都忽略了模型性能的重要空间特征。在这方面,空间半方差是补充模型评估的一种手段。特别是,使用松弛方法,结果得到了极大的改善:在高的库内流量下,模型结果与现场测量值相匹配,且通道总面积的95%以上在0.1 ms〜(-1)以内。可以在距原始测量点约1 m的半径内进行现场比较。建议修改后的模型评估形式与生态液压应用特别相关,因为生态液压应用具有一定程度的时空动力(或不确定性)。该方法还可以推广到其他环境科学建模应用程序中,其中模型拟合的空间属性值得关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号