...
首页> 外文期刊>Hydrological ProcHydrological Processesrnesses >Comparison of the performance of flow‐routing algorithms used in GIS‐based hydrologic analysis
【24h】

Comparison of the performance of flow‐routing algorithms used in GIS‐based hydrologic analysis

机译:基于GIS的水文分析中的选流算法性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Flow direction and specific catchment area were calculated for different flow-routing algorithms using TAPES-G and TauDEM. A fuzzy classification was used along with eight topo–climatic attributes to delineate six landscape classes from a 10-m USGS DEM. A series of maps and tabular outputs were produced to compare flow-routing predictions in different parts of the study area in the Santa Monica Mountains of southern California. The matched pair -test was used to compare the performance of pairs of specific catchment area grids across six user-defined fuzzy landscape classes. The results show that (1) the ‘source’ cells predicted with the D∞, DEMON, and FD8 algorithms were confined to hilltops; (2) two single flow-routing algorithms (Rho8, D8) produced poor results; and (3) the choice of flow-routing algorithm has potentially important consequences for the calculation of upslope contributing areas, sediment transport capacity, topographic wetness, and several other topographic indices. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:使用TAPES-G和TauDEM,针对不同的水流路由算法计算了水流方向和特定汇水面积。使用模糊分类和八个地形气候属性来描绘10米长USGS DEM中的六个景观类别。制作了一系列地图和表格输出,以比较南加州圣莫尼卡山脉研究区域不同部分的水流预报。匹配对测试用于比较六个用户定义的模糊景观类别中特定集水区网格对的性能。结果表明:(1)用D∞,DEMON和FD8算法预测的“源”单元仅限于山顶; (2)两种单一的路由算法(Rho8,D8)产生了较差的结果; (3)选流算法的选择对计算上坡贡献面积,泥沙输送能力,地形湿度和其他几个地形指数具有潜在的重要影响。版权所有©2007 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号