...
首页> 外文期刊>Hydrological Processes >Comparing Alpine Watershed Attributes From Lidar, Photogrammetric, And Contour-based Digital Elevationmodels
【24h】

Comparing Alpine Watershed Attributes From Lidar, Photogrammetric, And Contour-based Digital Elevationmodels

机译:从激光雷达,摄影测量和基于轮廓的数字高程模型比较高山流域属性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As part of an alpine hydrological study in the Canadian Rocky Mountains, three digital elevation model (DEM) data sets were obtained for the purpose of watershed characterization. The data sources were: (1) archived public access BC TRIM (Terrain Resource Information Management) 1 : 20000 contour vectors; (2) stereo aerial photography DEM with a derived point spacing between 5 m and 20 m; (3) airborne LiDAR (light detection and ranging) with point spacing from 1 m to 4 m. GIS layers of terrain and watershed attributes were created for each of the three DEM data sets at grid cell resolutions of 5 m and 25 m. Watershed attributes investigated were: DEM elevation, area, hypsometry, and stream network topology. In areas of lower relief and forest cover, the TRIM contour DEM contained topological errors at both 5 m and 25 m resolutions due to the poor representation of terrain from widely spaced contours. The photo DEM introduced obvious stream topology errors at 25 m due to the inability of the photo DEM to discern subtle terrain beneath forest canopies. The photo and TRIM DEMs overestimated basin hypsometry relative to the LiDAR watersheds at highest elevations due, in part, to their inability to represent the inside of gullies and steps associated with geological strata. In the case of the photo DEM, selectively digitizing break lines such as cliff edges, while missing shadowed areas, led to the creation of an interpolated surface that was biased towards the outer extremities of the terrain. Conversely, relative to the photo-based datasets, the LiDAR DEM better captured the inside of gullies and steps while under-sampling break line features, leading to a bias in the interpolated surface towards internal terrain extremities. As would be expected, the quality and resolution of the terrain data increased from BC TRIM to photo to LiDAR. If modelling watersheds within the Canadian Rockies at the meso scale and above, BC TRIM (or equivalent) 1 : 20 000 contour vectors would be most appropriate given availability and cost considerations. The benefits of LiDAR are apparent if higher resolution and more accurate watershed attribute information is needed detailing first-order hydrological channel features on steep shadowed mountain slopes or zero-order hill-slope depressions beneath forest canopies. Such landscape features provide preferential storages for winter snowpack in mountainous watersheds, suggesting that in the future LiDAR might be a tool of choice for snowpack resource monitoring in these regions.
机译:作为加拿大落基山脉高山水文研究的一部分,获得了三个数字高程模型(DEM)数据集以用于分水岭表征。数据源为:(1)存档的公共访问BC TRIM(地形资源信息管理)1:20000轮廓向量; (2)派生点间距在5 m和20 m之间的立体航空摄影DEM; (3)点间距为1 m至4 m的机载LiDAR(光检测和测距)。为三个DEM数据集的每一个创建了GIS地形和流域属性图层,网格单元分辨率为5 m和25 m。调查的分水岭属性为:DEM高程,面积,湿度法和河流网络拓扑。在起伏不大和森林覆盖率较低的地区,TRIM等高线DEM在5 m和25 m分辨率下都包含拓扑误差,这是由于宽间隔的等高线表示的地形较差。由于照片DEM无法识别森林冠层下的微妙地形,因此照片DEM在25 m处引入了明显的河流拓扑错误。相对于最高海拔的LiDAR流域,照片和TRIM DEM高估了盆地测井法,部分原因是它们无法表示沟壑内部和与地质地层有关的台阶。在使用照片DEM的情况下,选择性地数字化折断线(例如悬崖边缘),同时缺少阴影区域,从而导致创建了一个偏向于地形的外部末端的插值曲面。相反,相对于基于照片的数据集,LiDAR DEM可以更好地捕获沟壑和台阶的内部,同时对折线特征进行欠采样,从而导致插值曲面偏向内部地形末端。可以预期,从BC TRIM到照片再到LiDAR,地形数据的质量和分辨率都得到了提高。如果对加拿大落基山脉内的中尺度及以上尺度的流域进行建模,考虑到可用性和成本因素,BC TRIM(或等效)1:20000等高线向量将是最合适的。如果需要更高分辨率和更准确的分水岭属性信息,详细说明在森林冠层下的陡峭阴影山坡或零级山坡凹陷处的一阶水文通道特征,则LiDAR的好处显而易见。这样的景观特征为山区流域的冬季积雪提供了优先存储,这表明将来LiDAR可能会成为这些地区积雪资源监测的首选工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号