首页> 外文期刊>Hydrological Processes >Evaluation of remote sensing‐based evapotranspiration estimates using a water transfer numerical simulation under different vegetation conditions in an arid area
【24h】

Evaluation of remote sensing‐based evapotranspiration estimates using a water transfer numerical simulation under different vegetation conditions in an arid area

机译:在干旱地区不同植被条件下,利用调水数值模拟评估基于遥感的蒸散量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Daily actual evapotranspiration (AET) and seasonal AET values are of great practical importance in the management of regional water resources and hydrological modelling. Remotely sensed AET models and Landsat satellite images have been used widely in producing AET estimates at the field scale. However, the lack of validation at a high spatial frequency under different soil water conditions and vegetation coverages limits their operational applications. To assess the accuracies of remote sensing-based AET in an oasis-desert region, a total of 59 local-scale daily AET time series, simulated using HYDRUS-1D calibrated with soil moisture profiles, were used as ground truth values. Of 59 sampling sites, 31 sites were located in the oasis subarea and 28 sites were located in the desert subarea. Additionally, the locally validated mapping evapotranspiration at high resolution with internalized calibration surface energy balance model was employed to estimate instantaneous AET values in the area containing all 59 of the sampling sites using seven Landsat subimages acquired from June 5 to August 24 in 2011. Daily AET was obtained using extrapolation and interpolation methods with the instantaneous AET maps. Compared against HYDRUS-1D, the remote sensing-based method produced reasonably similar daily AET values for the oasis sites, while no correlation was observed for daily AET estimated using these two methods for the desert sites. Nevertheless, a reasonable monthly AET could be estimated. The correlation analysis between HYDRUS-1D-simulated and remote sensing-estimated monthly AET values showed relative root-mean-square error values of 15.1%, 12.1%, and 12.3% for June, July, and August, respectively. The root mean square error of the summer AET was 10.0%. Overall, remotely sensed models can provide reasonable monthly and seasonal AET estimates based on periodic snapshots from Landsat images in this arid oasis-desert region.
机译:每日实际蒸散量(AET)和季节性AET值在区域水资源管理和水文模拟中具有重要的现实意义。遥感AET模型和Landsat卫星图像已广泛用于实地规模的AET估算。但是,在不同的土壤水分条件和植被覆盖率下,缺乏高空间频率的验证限制了它们的应用。为了评估绿洲荒漠地区基于遥感的AET的准确性,使用经土壤湿度剖面校准的HYDRUS-1D模拟的总共59个当地规模的每日AET时间序列用作地面真实值。在59个采样点中,有31个采样点位于绿洲分区,而28个采样点位于沙漠分区。此外,采用2011年6月5日至8月24日采集的7个Landsat子图像,使用具有内部校准表面能平衡模型的高分辨率本地验证的映射蒸散量,并使用内部校准表面能平衡模型估算包含所有59个采样点的区域中的瞬时AET值。每日AET使用瞬时AET映射使用外推法和内插法获得。与HYDRUS-1D相比,基于遥感的方法对绿洲站点产生的每日AET值相当合理,而对于这两种沙漠站点,使用这两种方法估算的每日AET值没有相关性。但是,可以估计一个合理的每月AET。 HYDRUS-1D模拟的和遥感估算的每月AET值之间的相关性分析表明,6月,7月和8月的相对均方根误差值分别为15.1%,12.1%和12.3%。夏季AET的均方根误差为10.0%。总体而言,基于该干旱荒漠地区Landsat图像的定期快照,遥感模型可以提供合理的月度和季节AET估算值。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Hydrological Processes》 |2018年第12期|1801-1813|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Subtrop Agr, Key Lab Agroecol Proc Subtrop Reg, Changsha 410125, Hunan, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Water Cycle & Related Land Surface Proc, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China;

    Northwest Agr & Forest Univ, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, State Key Lab Soil Eros & Dryland Farming Loess P, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China;

    Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Subtrop Agr, Key Lab Agroecol Proc Subtrop Reg, Changsha 410125, Hunan, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    daily actual evapotranspiration; desert area; HYDRUS-1D; model evaluation; thermal remote sensing;

    机译:每日实际蒸散量;沙漠面积;HYDRUS-1D;模型评估;热遥感;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号