首页> 外文期刊>Human Studies >Typification in Society and Social Science: The Continuing Relevance of Schutz’s Social Phenomenology
【24h】

Typification in Society and Social Science: The Continuing Relevance of Schutz’s Social Phenomenology

机译:社会和社会科学中的典型化:舒茨的社会现象学的持续关联性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper examines Alfred Schutz’s insights on types and typification. Beginning with a brief overview of the history and meaning of typification in interpretive sociology, the paper further addresses both the ubiquity and the necessity of typification in social life and scientific method. Schutz’s contribution itself is lacking in empirical application and grounding, but examples are provided of ongoing empirical research which advances the understanding of types and typification. As is suggested by illustrations from scholarship in the social studies of social science, studies of social identity associated with membership categorization analysis, and constructionist social problems theory, typification can be found to be central to social research whether it is taken up as a largely unacknowledged resource or whether it is addressed by different names. The overview and illustrations suggest the continuing, widespread, and indeed foundational relevance of Schutz’s insights into types and typification.
机译:本文研究了Alfred Schutz对类型和类型的见解。从对解释性社会学中典型化的历史和意义的简要概述开始,本文进一步论述了典型性在社会生活和科学方法中的普遍性和必要性。 Schutz的贡献本身缺乏经验应用和基础,但是提供了正在进行的经验研究的实例,这些研究可以增进对类型和类型的理解。正如社会科学社会研究中的奖学金插图,与会员资格分类分析相关的社会身份研究以及建构主义社会问题理论所表明的那样,对于社会研究而言,无论类型类型是否被广泛认可,典型化都可以被视为典型资源或是否使用不同的名称寻址。概述和插图说明了Schutz对类型和类型的见解的持续,广泛,乃至根本的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号