首页> 外文期刊>Human Rights Law Review >International Human Rights Law, Reparatory Justice and the Re-Ordering of Memory in Central and Eastern Europe
【24h】

International Human Rights Law, Reparatory Justice and the Re-Ordering of Memory in Central and Eastern Europe

机译:国际人权法,赔偿性司法与中欧和东欧的记忆重新排序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Focusing on two complaints submitted to the United Nations Human Rights Committee, by former property owners in the Czech Republic, this article reviews measures of reparatory justice that have been introduced in Central and Eastern Europe since 1990. The article argues that, in rejecting claims of discriminatory treatment by ethnic Germans denied property restitution in the Czech Republic, the HRC has shown a lack of both historical and moral judgment, as well as a failure to give reasons for its decisions. The article suggests that one of the functions of national and international human rights law is to establish sites of historical memory, as suggested by Patrick Macklem. However, law’s ‘memorial sites’ must acknowledge the moral ambiguities that characterise historical experiences such as the post-war resettlement of millions of Germans from parts of Central and Eastern Europe.
机译:本文以捷克共和国前财产所有人向联合国人权事务委员会提交的两份投诉为重点,回顾了自1990年以来在中欧和东欧实行的赔偿性司法措施。由于在捷克共和国否认归还财产,德意志民族歧视性对待,因此,人权理事会表现出缺乏历史和道义上的判断力,也没有给出做出决定的理由。文章建议,正如帕特里克·麦克莱姆(Patrick Macklem)所建议的那样,国家和国际人权法的功能之一就是建立历史记忆场所。但是,法律的“纪念地”必须承认存在历史经验的道德歧义,例如战后从中欧和东欧部分地区重新安置数百万德国人之后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号