首页> 外文期刊>Human Factors >Perspective: Group Cognition Factors in Sociotechnical Systems
【24h】

Perspective: Group Cognition Factors in Sociotechnical Systems

机译:观点:社会技术系统中的群体认知因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: This commentary on the special issue suggests a focus on group cognition factors in investigations of teamwork involving sociotechnical systems. Background: The author has conducted research in computer-supported collaborative learning and has found the need to rethink the theory and methodology of that field to take account of its defining characteristics of small-group interaction and sociotechnical mediation. Method: A brief literature review is undertaken of major findings in postcognitive theory and conversation analysis. This suggests a methodological priority to group phenomena as sources for the genesis of individual phenomena and for understanding of processes of coordination and communication in small groups. Results: It is seen that many recent studies of teams take place within traditional disciplinary frameworks that analyze phenomena primarily at the individual unit of analysis, reducing group phenomena to additive sums of individual phenomena. For instance, processes of coordination and communication are treated as secondary to the expression of individuals' mental models or external expressions of internal representations. Conclusion: The commentary calls for development of a new science of groups, with the development of appropriate theory, conceptualizations of core phenomena, experimental methods, analytic analyses, and presentational formats. Examples are focus on discourse analysis, use of design-based research, conceptualization of mediation rather than causation, and publication of case studies. Application: A focus on the group unit of analysis can shed new light on the topics addressed in this special issue.
机译:目的:对这个特殊问题的评论建议,在涉及社会技术系统的团队合作调查中,应重点关注群体认知因素。背景:作者对计算机支持的协作学习进行了研究,发现有必要重新考虑该领域的理论和方法,以考虑其小组互动和社会技术中介的定义特征。方法:对后认知理论和会话分析的主要发现进行简短的文献综述。这表明在方法上优先考虑将群体现象作为个体现象的起源以及对小组中的协调和沟通过程的理解的来源。结果:可以看到,最近对团队的许多研究都是在传统的学科框架内进行的,这些学科框架主要在单个分析单元上分析现象,从而将群体现象简化为单个现象的累加总和。例如,协调和沟通的过程被视为对个人心理模型的表达或内部表征的外部表达的次要。结论:该评论呼吁发展一种新的团体科学,包括发展适当的理论,核心现象的概念化,实验方法,分析性分析和表述形式。例子集中在话语分析,基于设计的研究的使用,调解而不是因果关系的概念化以及案例研究的发表。应用:重点放在小组分析上可以为本期特刊中的主题提供新的思路。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Human Factors》 |2010年第2期|p.340-343|共4页
  • 作者

    Gerry Stahl;

  • 作者单位

    College of Information Science and Technology, 3141 Chestnut Street, Office: Rush 409, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:19:09

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号