首页> 外文期刊>Human Factors >The Effect of Key Size of Touch Screen Virtual Keyboards on Productivity, Usability, and Typing Biomechanics
【24h】

The Effect of Key Size of Touch Screen Virtual Keyboards on Productivity, Usability, and Typing Biomechanics

机译:触摸屏虚拟键盘的键大小对生产率,可用性和键入生物力学的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: We investigated whether different virtual keyboard key sizes affected typing force exposures, muscle activity, wrist posture, comfort, and typing productivity. Background: Virtual keyboard use is increasing and the physical exposures associated with virtual keyboard key sizes are not well documented. Method: Typing forces, forearm/shoulder muscle activity, wrist posture, subjective comfort, and typing productivity were measured from 21 subjects while they were typing on four different virtual keyboards with square key sizes, which were 13, 16, 19, and 22 mm on each side with 2-mm between-key spacing. Results: The results showed that virtual keyboard key size had little effect on typing force, forearm muscle activity, and ulnar/radial deviation. However, the virtual keyboard with the 13-mm keys had a 15% slower typing speed (p < .0001), slightly higher static (10th percentile) shoulder muscle activity (2% maximum voluntary contractions, p = .01), slightly greater wrist extension in both hands (2° to 3°, p < .01), and the lowest subjective comfort and preference ratings (p < . 1). Conclusions: The study findings indicate that virtual keyboards with a key size less than 16 mm may be too small for touch typing given the slower typing speed, higher static shoulder muscle activity, greater wrist extension, and lowest subjective preferences. Applications: We evaluated the effects of virtual keyboard key sizes on typing force exposures, muscle activity, comfort, and typing productivity.
机译:目的:我们调查了不同的虚拟键盘按键大小是否会影响打字力,肌肉活动,腕部姿势,舒适度和打字效率。背景:虚拟键盘的使用正在增加,并且与虚拟键盘按键大小相关的物理暴露没有得到充分记录。方法:在21位受试者使用四个13、16、19和22 mm方形方形大小的虚拟键盘打字时,对他们进行了打字力,前臂/肩膀肌肉活动,腕部姿势,主观舒适度和打字效率的测量。每侧键间距为2毫米。结果:结果表明,虚拟键盘键的大小对打字力,前臂肌肉活动以及尺骨/ radi骨偏离几乎没有影响。但是,具有13毫米键的虚拟键盘的打字速度降低了15%(p <.0001),静态(10%)的肩部肌肉活动略高(最大2%的自愿收缩,p = 0.01),稍大双手腕部伸展(2°至3°,p <.01),主观舒适度和偏好等级最低(p <。1)。结论:研究发现表明,鉴于打字速度较慢,肩部静态肌肉活动较高,手腕伸展较大且主观偏好较低,按键大小小于16毫米的虚拟键盘对于触摸打字而言可能太小。应用程序:我们评估了虚拟键盘按键大小对打字力度,肌肉活动,舒适度和打字效率的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Human Factors》 |2014年第7期|1235-1248|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Northern Illinois University, 590 Garden Road, EB240, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences at the University of Washington in Seattle;

    Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences at the University of Washington in Seattle;

    Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Washington in Seattle;

    Ergonomics R&D Program at Hewlett-Packard Company in Houston, Texas;

    Laboratory at the University of Washington in Seattle;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    typing biomechanics; human-computer interface; electromyography; electrogoniometer;

    机译:键入生物力学;人机界面;肌电图电动测角仪;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:18:44

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号