首页> 外文期刊>Human Dimensions of Wildlife >Media coverage of lethal control: A case study of kangaroo culling in the Australian Capital Territory
【24h】

Media coverage of lethal control: A case study of kangaroo culling in the Australian Capital Territory

机译:媒体对致死性控制的报道:以澳大利亚首都特区的袋鼠扑杀为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Culling kangaroos, Australia's most abundant marsupial, is a controversial practice in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). The ACT government introduced a kangaroo management plan in response to the growing kangaroo population causing damage in grassland ecosystems. Although some groups (e.g., local government, some researchers) support implementation of this plan, critics claim it is inhumane and lacks concrete evidence. To examine media portrayal of this debate, this study conducted a content analysis of newspaper coverage between 2006 and 2016. Although ACT newspapers were impartial in their presentation of the debate, sources that previous studies found were typically considered trustworthy to speak on the scientific validity of the program were found to have conflicting messages and be less represented in the media. Thus, future research should explore if the messenger is more important than the message in determining influences on public perceptions about the use of lethal control.
机译:在澳大利亚首都地区(ACT),扑灭袋鼠是澳大利亚最有袋的有袋动物,这是有争议的做法。为应对不断增长的袋鼠种群对草原生态系统的破坏,澳大利亚首都地区政府推出了袋鼠管理计划。尽管一些团体(例如,地方政府,一些研究人员)支持该计划的实施,但批评者声称这是不人道的,并且缺乏具体证据。为了研究媒体对这场辩论的描述,本研究对2006年至2016年间的报纸报道进行了内容分析。尽管ACT报纸在介绍辩论方面是公正的,但以前的研究发现的消息来源通常被认为可信赖地谈论科学的有效性。该程序被发现有冲突的消息,并且在媒体中的代表较少。因此,未来的研究应该探讨在确定对使用致命控制手段的公众看法的影响方面,使者是否比信息更重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号