首页> 外文期刊>Housing, theory and society >Whose place? Whose history? Contrasting narratives and experiences of neighbourhood change and housing renewal
【24h】

Whose place? Whose history? Contrasting narratives and experiences of neighbourhood change and housing renewal

机译:谁的地方谁的历史?社区变化和房屋更新的对比叙述和经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper suggests that more attention needs to be given to the historical formation and development of neighbourhood attachment in working-class areas. Notions of belonging and identity may be contingent, complex or contradictory and are shaped by the characteristics of place. The pattern of population change over time through the impact of migration is especially important in shaping notions of neighbourhood identity and perceptions of change. The sustainability of the local public realm and sites for local social interaction also figure strongly in narratives of change. The paper considers whether it is valuable to analyse these processes of change and continuity through the concept of path dependence. The paper suggests path dependence is of limited heuristic value, as it is difficult for this frame work to capture self-reinforcing, reactive, punctuated or incremental patterns of change - all of which were evident in the six research neighbourhoods. The paper suggests that a less deterministic "pathways " approach to neighbourhood change may be a more productive way forward.
机译:本文提出,需要更多关注工人阶级地区邻里依恋的历史形成和发展。归属和身份的概念可能是偶然的,复杂的或矛盾的,并受场所特征的影响。由于移民的影响,人口随时间变化的模式对于塑造邻里身份和对变化的看法尤其重要。变革叙事中,地方公共领域和地方社会互动场所的可持续性也很重要。本文考虑通过路径依赖的概念来分析这些变化和连续性过程是否有价值。该论文表明,路径依赖具有有限的启发式价值,因为该框架难以捕获自我强化,反应性,标点性或增量式的变化模式-所有这些在六个研究社区中都是显而易见的。该论文表明,对邻里变化的确定性较低的“途径”方法可能是更具生产力的前进方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号