...
首页> 外文期刊>Housing studies >Should Policy Makers Strive for Neighborhood Social Mix? An Analysis of the Western European Evidence Base
【24h】

Should Policy Makers Strive for Neighborhood Social Mix? An Analysis of the Western European Evidence Base

机译:决策者应该争取邻里社会融合吗?西欧证据基础分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The paper presents an analytical framework for elucidating the equity and social efficiency criteria that might be used to justify a housing policy aiming for a substantial mix of neighborhood residents by income, ethnicity and/or immigrant status. This framework permits the classification of multivariate statistical studies comprising the Western European evidence base and shows the importance of distinguishing intra- and extra-neighborhood processes when evaluating evidence related to the efficiency criterion. Evaluation of the evidence base in light of this framework reveals that it sufficiently supports a mixing policy aimed at avoiding concentrations of disadvantaged individuals if and only if policy makers emphasize equity grounds (i.e. improving the well-being of the disadvantaged absolutely). The evidence base does not support a mixing policy on efficiency grounds, regardless of whether intra-neighborhood social interactions or extra-neighborhood stigmatization/resource restrictions are presumed to be the primary causal mechanism for neighborhood effects.
机译:本文提供了一个分析框架,用于阐明公平和社会效率标准,这些标准可用于证明住房政策的合理性,该政策旨在按收入,种族和/或移民身份,对邻里居民进行大量混合。该框架允许对包括西欧证据基础的多元统计研究进行分类,并显示了在评估与效率标准相关的证据时区分邻居内和邻居外过程的重要性。根据这一框架对证据基础的评估表明,它足以支持旨在避免弱势群体集中的混合政策,前提是政策制定者强调公平基础(即绝对改善弱势群体的福祉)。证据基础不支持基于效率的混合政策,无论假定邻居内部的社会互动还是邻居外部的污名化/资源限制都是邻居效应的主要因果机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号