首页> 外文期刊>Housing and development reporter >Court Refuses to Remand Case To HUD for Further Conciliation
【24h】

Court Refuses to Remand Case To HUD for Further Conciliation

机译:法院拒绝将案发还给HUD进行进一步和解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illi-nois refused the defendants' motion to remand a fair housing case to HUD for further conciliation efforts after the defendants had elected to take the case to court. (U.S. v. Shanrie Company, No. 05-CV-306-DKH, 2006 WL 219574 (S.D.Ill.), January 26, 2006) When the defendants exercised their option under the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 3612(o), to proceed in federal court, the HUD administrative law judge (ALJ) terminated the administrative proceeding. The government then filed this action. The defendants moved to remand the case to HUD, arguing that they had been deprived of an opportunity to resolve the complaint through conciliation.
机译:美国南伊利诺伊州南部地区地方法院拒绝了被告人的动议,要求在被告人选择将案件提交法院后,将公平住房案还给HUD进一步调解。 (U.S. v。Shanrie Company,No.05-CV-306-DKH,2006 WL 219574(S.D.Ill。),2006年1月26日)当被告根据《公平住房法》行使其选择权时,U.S. 42第3612(o)条规定,为了在联邦法院进行诉讼,HUD行政法法官(ALJ)终止了行政诉讼。政府随后提出了这一诉讼。被告提出将案发还给HUD,理由是他们被剥夺了通过调解解决申诉的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号