首页> 外文期刊>Housing and development reporter >Air Rights Easement Doesn't Meet Criteria for Charitable Deduction
【24h】

Air Rights Easement Doesn't Meet Criteria for Charitable Deduction

机译:简化航空权利不符合慈善扣除标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A property owner who donated a conservation easement limiting his rights to develop air space above a historic building is not entitled to a charitable deduction under Section 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, the U.S. Tax Court ruled. (Herman v. Commissioner, No. 14005-07, 2009 WL 2923945 (U.S. Tax Ct.), September 14, 2009)rnTaxpayer J. Maurice Herman, through his wholly owned limited liability company, Windsor Plaza, L.L.C., held an 11-story apartment building on Fifth Avenue in New York City, along with the development rights to 22,000 square feet above the building.rnThe National Park Service determined that the property contributes to the significance of the Upper East Side Historic District and is a certified historic structure within the meaning of Section 170(h)(4)(B)(ii).
机译:美国税收法院裁定,捐赠保护地役权以限制其在历史建筑上方发展空气空间的权利的财产所有者无权根据《内部税收法》第170(h)条获得慈善扣除。 (Herman诉专员,2009年第14005-07号,WL 2923945(美国税务局),2009年9月14日)纳税人J. Maurice Herman通过其全资拥有的有限责任公司Windsor Plaza,LLC在11-纽约市第五大道上的故事公寓楼,以及该楼上方22,000平方英尺的开发权。国家公园管理局确定该物业对上东区历史街区的重要性做出了贡献,并且是经过认证的历史建筑第170(h)(4)(B)(ii)节的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号