The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted a motion to dismiss to the defendant owner of a company that owned and operated an apartment complex in D.D. that was funded through housing choice voucher payments through a HAP contract under Section 8. The individual owner was one defendant sued by a tenant at the apartment complex in an action under the False Claims Act alleging that the complex billed the United States for necessary repairs that were supposedly made but did not resolve the problems. The motion was granted because the tenant did not allege that Section 8 payments were made to him in addition to or instead of the company which managed the complex United States ex rel. Jenkins v. Sanford Capital. 2020 WL 5440551. Civil Action No.: 17-239 (D.D.C. Sent 9. 2019).
展开▼
