...
首页> 外文期刊>Higher Education >Groupwork as a form of assessment: common problems and recommended solutions
【24h】

Groupwork as a form of assessment: common problems and recommended solutions

机译:团队合作作为一种评估形式:常见问题和建议的解决方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper reviews some of the literature on the use of groupwork as a form of assessment in tertiary institutions. It outlines the considerable advantages of groupwork but also its systemic associated problems. In discussing the problems, the paper considers issues such as “free riding” and the “sucker effect”, issues associated with ethnic mix in groups, and the social dilemma problem—in which students face conflicting demands between altruism and self-interest. The paper then outlines several models of effective groupwork and makes suggestions for implementing groupwork tasks. The paper also looks at the key assessment tasks which are commonly employed—namely, additive, conjunctive, disjunctive and discretionary tasks—and assesses which are most suited to groupwork. The paper considers the related issues of task complexity, recognition for effort, and strategies for minimising issues concerning group size. The paper also briefly considers strategies for implementing incentives for groupwork members, and outlines the issue of penalties for unproductive group members. The paper concludes by providing recommendations for how to maximise the advantages of groupwork while trying to minimise the disadvantages.
机译:本文回顾了有关使用团体工作作为大专院校评估形式的一些文献。它概述了团队合作的巨大优势,但也概述了与系统相关的问题。在讨论这些问题时,本文考虑了“搭便车”和“吸盘效应”,与群体种族混合相关的问题以及社会困境问题,这些问题使学生面临利他主义和自我利益之间的冲突要求。然后,本文概述了有效的小组工作的几种模型,并提出了实施小组工作的建议。本文还探讨了常用的关键评估任务,即加性,合取性,析取性和自由裁量性任务,并评估了最适合团队合作的评估。本文考虑了任务复杂性,对工作的认可以及使小组规模有关的问题最小化的策略等相关问题。本文还简要考虑了实施针对团体成员的奖励措施的策略,并概述了对非生产性团体成员的处罚问题。本文最后提出了有关如何最大程度地发挥团队合作优势,同时尽量减少不利条件的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号