首页> 外文期刊>Heron >Discounting for optimal and acceptable technical facilities involving risks
【24h】

Discounting for optimal and acceptable technical facilities involving risks

机译:折价获得风险的最佳且可接受的技术设施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Technical facilities should be optimal with respect to benefits and cost. Optimization of technical facilities involving risks for human life and limb require an acceptability criterion and suitable discount rates both for the public and the operator depending on for whom the optimization is carried out. The life quality index is presented and embedded into modern socio-economic concepts. A general risk acceptability criterion is derived. The societal life saving cost ( = implied cost of averting a fatality) to be used in optimization as live saving or compensation cost and the societal willingness-to-pay based on the societal value of a statistical life or on the societal life quality index are developed, the latter for three different mortality regimes. Discount rates r must be long term averages in view of the time horizon of some 20 to more than 100 years for the facilities of interest and net of inflation and taxes. While the operator may use long term averages from the financial market for his cost-benefit analysis the assessment of interest rates for investments of the public into risk reduction is more difficult. The classical Ramsey model decomposes the real interest rate (= output growth rate) into the rate of time preference of consumption and the rate of economical growth multiplied by the elasticity of marginal utility of consumption. It is found that the rate of time preference of consumption should be a little larger than the long term population growth rate if used for the determination of parameters in the acceptability criterion. The output growth rate on the other hand should be smaller than the sum of the population growth rate and the long term growth rate of a national economy which is around 2% for most industrial countries. Accordingly, the rate of time preference of consumption is about 1%, which is also intergenerationally acceptable from an ethical point of view. It is also shown that given a certain output growth rate there is a corresponding maximum interest rate in order to maintain non-negativity of the objective function.
机译:就收益和成本而言,技术设施应该是最佳的。对涉及生命和肢体风险的技术设施进行优化,需要一个可接受的标准,并针对公众和运营商(取决于进行优化的对象),采用适当的折现率。提出生活质量指数并将其嵌入现代社会经济概念中。得出了一般风险可接受性标准。用于优化的社会救生成本(=避免丧命的隐含成本)用作现场救生或补偿成本,以及基于统计生活的社会价值或社会生活质量指数的社会支付意愿为发达国家,后者针对三种不同的死亡率制度。考虑到利息设施以及扣除通货膨胀和税收后的20至100多年的时间范围,折现率r必须是长期平均值。尽管运营商可能会使用金融市场的长期平均值进行成本效益分析,但评估公众对降低风险的投资的利率却更加困难。经典的拉姆齐模型将实际利率(=产出增长率)分解为消费的时间偏好率和经济增长率乘以消费的边际效用弹性。发现,如果用于确定可接受性标准中的参数,则消费的时间偏好率应该比长期人口增长率稍大。另一方面,产出增长率应小于人口增长率与国民经济的长期增长率之和,在大多数工业化国家中,长期增长率约为2%。因此,消费的时间偏好率约为1%,从伦理的角度来看,这也是代际可接受的。还表明,在给定的产出增长率下,为了维持目标函数的非负值,存在相应的最大利率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号