...
首页> 外文期刊>Hi-Fi news >Advantages of bi-amping with one amp?
【24h】

Advantages of bi-amping with one amp?

机译:一安培双功放的优势?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Recently I bought an Onkyo TX-SR605 AV receiver for my separate home theatre only set up. Your lab tests [HFN, Oct '07] showed that it delivered 2 × 130W and 5 × 95W. It runs hot and sounds very nice and I am beginning to listen to more and more music on this set-up, increasingly ignoring my stereo music-only system. As I do not use the rear channels of the Onkyo I can reassign them and bi-amp the ATC SCM 7s I use as front speakers. While there may be theoretical advantages to passive bi-amping when using two completely different amps, what are the advantages, if any, of this set up? The reason I ask is that as they share a common power supply am I not correct in thinking the total wattage is likely to drop? I don't want to trade any potential advantage of bi-amping with the prospect of clipping due to inadequate power, as I listen at rather loud levels. By the way, in the November '07 issue of Howe Cinema Choice the same Onkyo receiver was measured at just 30W with five channels driven. I have to say that I am a bit puzzled by this.
机译:最近,我为单独安装的家庭影院购买了Onkyo TX-SR605 AV接收机。您的实验室测试[HFN,07年10月]显示它提供了2×130W和5×95W。它运行起来很热,听起来很不错,在这种设置下,我开始听越来越多的音乐,而越来越多地忽略了我的纯立体声音乐系统。由于我不使用Onkyo的后声道,因此可以重新分配它们,并对用作前置扬声器的ATC SCM 7s进行双功放。当使用两个完全不同的放大器时,无源双功放在理论上可能有优势,但这种设置有什么优势(如果有)?我问的原因是因为它们共享一个公共电源,所以我认为总瓦数可能会下降是不正确的吗?我不想用双功放的任何潜在优势来交换由于功率不足而导致削波的可能性,因为我的声音很大。顺便说一句,在07年11月发行的Howe Cinema Choice中,相同的Onkyo接收器仅在30W的功率下测量了五个声道。我不得不说,对此我感到有点困惑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号