...
首页> 外文期刊>Hi-Fi News >The great amplifier debate
【24h】

The great amplifier debate

机译:大放大器辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

During the last year [writes Richard Oliver] I have been fascinated to note that others have come to a conclusion that my ears indicated a long time ago - ie, all is not well with some transistor amplifiers. Of course, there have been some stinkers of valve amplifiers too, but why is it all such a great mystery when it comes to transistor models? The case is oft-presented that this is something that seems to be audible but cannot be measured. I doubt it. I suspect that the right measurements, interpreted correctly, would show very clearly why things appear to be wrong. But before making a suggestion for a measurement that might well show up one reason, I ought to make it clear that I am not interested in crossover distortion.
机译:在去年[理查德·奥利弗(Richard Oliver)撰写]中,我着迷地注意到,其他人得出的结论是,我的耳朵很久以前就已经表示过-即,对于某些晶体管放大器而言,一切都不尽人意。当然,也有一些阀门放大器的臭味,但是为什么在晶体管模型上却有这么大的神秘呢?经常出现的情况是,这似乎是听得见但无法衡量的。我对此表示怀疑。我怀疑正确解释的正确测量方法会非常清楚地表明为什么事情看起来是错误的。但是在提出可能很可能表明其原因的测量建议之前,我应该明确指出,我对交叉失真不感兴趣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号