首页> 外文期刊>Heart >Featured Correspondence
【24h】

Featured Correspondence

机译:特色书信

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To the Editor: The conclusion in the article by Bridgewater et al~1 that mandatory reporting and public scrutiny have not resulted in risk-averse behaviour but rather have improved surgeons' performance is simply wishful thinking not supported by data from other quality-driven states such as New York.~2 A more likely explanation for their findings is that public scrutiny increased the pressure to assign higher EuroSCORES, so despite the fact that they operated on patients at lower risk (as shown by the lower mortality), the predicted mortality was higher.
机译:致编辑:布里奇沃特等人[1]在文章中得出的结论是,强制性报告和公众监督并未导致规避风险行为,而是改善了外科医生的表现,这只是一厢情愿的想法,不受其他质量驱动状态的数据支持〜2对于他们的发现,更可能的解释是,公众审查增加了分配更高的EuroSCORES的压力,因此尽管他们对较低风险的患者进行了手术(如较低的死亡率所示),但预计死亡率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号