...
首页> 外文期刊>Heart >Myocardial Blood Flow In Patients With Low-flow, Low-gradient Aortic Stenosis: Differences Between True And Pseudo-severe Aortic Stenosis. Results From The Multicentre Topas (truly Or Pseudo-severe Aortic Stenosis) Study
【24h】

Myocardial Blood Flow In Patients With Low-flow, Low-gradient Aortic Stenosis: Differences Between True And Pseudo-severe Aortic Stenosis. Results From The Multicentre Topas (truly Or Pseudo-severe Aortic Stenosis) Study

机译:低流量,低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的心肌血流:真性和假性-严重性主动脉瓣狭窄之间的差异。多中心托帕斯(真正或假性严重主动脉瓣狭窄)研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Impairment of myocardial flow reserve (MFR) in aortic stenosis (AS) with normal left ventricular function relates to the haemodynamic severity. Objectives: To investigate whether myocardial blood flow (MBF) and MFR differ in low-flow, low-gradient AS depending on whether there is underlying true-severe AS (TSAS) or pseudo-severe AS (PSAS). Methods: In 36 patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS, dynamic [~(13)N]ammonia PET perfusion imaging was performed at rest (n = 36) and during dipyridamole stress (n = 20) to quantify MBF and MFR. Dobutamine echocardiography was used to classify patients as TSAS (n = 18) or PSAS (n = 18) based on the indexed projected effective orifice area (EOA) at a normal flow rate of 250 ml/s (EOAI_(proj) ≤ or >0.55 cm~2/m~2). Results: Compared with healthy controls (n = 14), patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS had higher resting mean (SD) MBF (0.83 (0.21) vs 0.69 (0.09) ml/min/g, p = 0.001), reduced hyperaemic MBF (1.16 (0.31) vs 2.71 (0.50) ml/min/g, p<0.001) and impaired MFR (1.44 (0.44) vs 4.00 (0.91), p<0.001). Resting MBF and MFR correlated with indices of AS severity in low-flow, low-gradient AS with the strongest relationship observed for EOAI_(proj) (r_s = -0.50, p = 0.002 and r_s = 0.61, p = 0.004, respectively). Compared with PSAS, TSAS had a trend to a higher resting MBF (0.90 (0.19) vs 0.77 (0.21) ml/min/g, p = 0.06), similar hyperaemic MBF (1.16 (0.31) vs 1.17 (0.32) ml/min/g, p = NS), but a significantly smaller MFR (1.19 (0.26) vs 1.76 (0.41), p = 0.003). An MFR <1.8 had an accuracy of 85% for distinguishing TSAS from PSAS. Conclusions: Low-flow, low-gradient AS is characterised by higher resting MBF and reduced MFR that relates to the AS severity. The degree of MFR impairment differs between TSAS and PSAS and may be of value for distinguishing these entities.
机译:背景:左心功能正常的主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)中的心肌血流储备(MFR)受损与血液动力学严重程度有关。目的:研究在低流量,低梯度的AS中心肌血流量(MBF)和MFR是否不同,这取决于是否存在潜在的真重度AS(TSAS)或假性重度AS(PSAS)。方法:在36例低流量,低梯度AS患者中,在静止(n = 36)和双嘧达莫应激(n = 20)期间进行动态[〜(13)N]氨PET灌注成像以定量MBF和MFR 。在正常流速为250 ml / s(EOAI_(proj)≤或>)的基础上,根据索引的预测有效孔面积(EOA),使用多巴酚丁胺超声心动图将患者分为TSAS(n = 18)或PSAS(n = 18)。 0.55 cm〜2 / m〜2)。结果:与健康对照组(n = 14)相比,低流量,低梯度AS患者的静息平均(SD)MBF较高(0.83(0.21)vs 0.69(0.09)ml / min / g,p = 0.001) ,充血性MBF降低(1.16(0.31)vs 2.71(0.50)ml / min / g,p <0.001)和MFR受损(1.44(0.44)vs 4.00(0.91),p <0.001)。静息MBF和MFR与低流量,低梯度AS的AS严重性指标相关,对于EOAI_(proj)观察到最强的关系(r_s = -0.50,p = 0.002,r_s = 0.61,p = 0.004)。与PSAS相比,TSAS有更高的静息MBF趋势(0.90(0.19)对0.77(0.21)ml / min / g,p = 0.06),类似的高血MBF(1.16(0.31)对1.17(0.32)ml / min / g,p = NS),但MFR明显较小(1.19(0.26)vs 1.76(0.41),p = 0.003)。 MFR <1.8,用于区分TSAS和PSAS的准确度为85%。结论:低流量,低梯度AS的特征在于较高的静息MBF和与AS严重程度相关的MFR降低。 MFR减损的程度在TSAS和PSAS之间有所不同,可能对于区分这些实体具有价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号