首页> 外文期刊>Health, Risk & Society >Magazine portrayal of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADD/ADHD): A post-modern epidemic in a post-trust society
【24h】

Magazine portrayal of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADD/ADHD): A post-modern epidemic in a post-trust society

机译:杂志描述注意缺陷/多动症(ADD / ADHD):信任后社会中的后现代流行病

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

One of the significantly increasing risks in modern society is that of childhood mental, developmental and behavioural disorders. Attention deficit disorder (ADD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are cases in point. This paper uses a social constructionist and framing approach to investigate the portrayal of risks associated with ADD/ADHD in popular magazines directed towards mass audiences in English speaking North America from 1988-2008. Aqualitative content analysis examines how the magazine articles answer the following questions about ADD and ADHD portrayal: (1) what is it?; (2) what is said to cause it?; and (3) what can be done about it? The findings suggest that ADD and ADHD are portrayed in polarising and contradictory ways in this popular medium. Magazine stories demonstrate deep ambivalence about whether or not ADD/ADHD even exist. They question whether or not the associated behaviours constitute medical problems. Despite this, described research on the causes of ADD/ADHD is almost always authoritatively described as either genetic or biological. Treatment by medications is often portrayed as profoundly problematic. This contentious and confusing portrayal exacerbates uncertainty and underscores the perception of risk. It reflects the competing interests operating in the social environment of ADD/ADHD including an ongoing but inconsistent tendency to medicalise this as other childhood mental/developmental/behavioural disorders.
机译:现代社会中显着增加的风险之一是儿童精神,发育和行为障碍的风险。注意缺陷障碍(ADD)和注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是恰当的例子。本文采用社会建构主义和框架化方法来调查1988-2008年针对北美英语人群的大众杂志中与ADD / ADHD相关的风险刻画。水色内容分析研究了杂志文章如何回答有关ADD和ADHD刻画的以下问题:(1)这是什么? (2)据说是什么原因造成的? (3)对此可以做些什么?这些发现表明,在这种流行的媒体中,ADD和ADHD的描述是两极分化和矛盾的。杂志的故事表明,对于甚至不存在ADD / ADHD,他们都有很深的矛盾。他们质疑相关行为是否构成医学问题。尽管如此,关于ADD / ADHD病因的描述研究几乎总是被权威地描述为遗传或生物学研究。通常认为用药物治疗存在严重问题。这种有争议和令人困惑的描述加剧了不确定性,并强调了风险意识。它反映了在ADD / ADHD的社会环境中竞争的利益冲突,包括将其医学化为其他儿童期心理/发育/行为障碍的持续但不一致的趋势。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Health, Risk & Society》 |2011年第8期|p.621-636|共16页
  • 作者

    Juanne N. Clarke;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Sociology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Ontario, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:58:36

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号