首页> 外文期刊>Health Care for Women International >“Knights” or “Knaves”? Public Policy, Professional Power, and Reforming Maternity Services
【24h】

“Knights” or “Knaves”? Public Policy, Professional Power, and Reforming Maternity Services

机译:“骑士”或“小刀”?公共政策,专业权力和孕产服务改革

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent quality and safety discourse stresses locating “human errors and mistakes” within an institutional framework. I go further to contend that, in spite of well-meaning individual practitioners, aspects of a powerful, self-interested obstetric professional culture pose a major barrier to quality childbirth care. Using my analysis, I contrast the profession's “knightly” self-image with critical scholarship, and it examine evidence given to public inquiries into obstetric misdemeanors and mistakes in Australia, England, and Ireland. Policy incentives to reform maternity care need to go beyond technical auditing measures to foster collaboration, social as well as institutional accountability, and critical self-reflection within the obstetric profession.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2010.529218
机译:最近的质量和安全论述强调在机构框架内定位“人为错误和错误”。我进一步指出,尽管个人从业者善意,但是强大的,利己的产科专业文化的各个方面构成了优质分娩护理的主要障碍。通过我的分析,我将该行业的“骑士”自我形象与批判性学术研究进行了对比,并研究了公开询问有关澳大利亚,英国和爱尔兰产科轻罪和失误的证据。改革产妇保健的政策激励措施不应该局限于技术审核措施,以促进产科专业内部的协作,社会以及机构责任制和重要的自我反省。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = { ”,services_compact:“ citeulike,网络振动,微博,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2010.529218

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号