首页> 外文期刊>Health Care Analysis >Ronald Dworkin’s “Prudent Insurance” Ideal for Healthcare: Idealisations of Circumstance, Prudence and Self-interest
【24h】

Ronald Dworkin’s “Prudent Insurance” Ideal for Healthcare: Idealisations of Circumstance, Prudence and Self-interest

机译:罗纳德·德沃金(Ronald Dworkin)的“审慎保险”医疗保健理想之选:情境,审慎和自利的理想化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

I will focus on Dworkin’s use of idealisation in his “Prudent Insurance” Ideal for healthcare. Dworkin identifies problems with the circumstances under which people make their insurance decisions in the current United States healthcare system and he sees these as being the cause of strange resource allocation outcomes. He therefore imagines idealising away these prima facie unjust circumstances to develop a hypothetical market in which people are able to make better decisions (Section “Idealisation of Circumstance”). I will identify two further idealisations that Dworkin relies on in his theory. The first is to idealise people to be perfectly prudent (Section “Idealisation of Prudence”), which I consider to be justifiable, but difficult to actually apply in practise. The second is to idealise people to be perfectly self-interested (Section “Idealisation to Self-interest”). I do not see this as a justifiable idealization since it ignores principles of altruism and citizenship, which would seem to be deeply relevant to a theory of justice.
机译:我将在德沃金在医疗保健的“审慎保险”理想中重点介绍理想化的使用。德沃金发现了人们在当前美国医疗保健系统中做出保险决定的情况下的问题,他认为这些问题是造成资源分配结果异常的原因。因此,他设想将这些表面上不公正的情况理想化,以开发人们能够做出更好决策的假设市场(“情况的理想化”部分)。我将确定德沃金在其理论中所依赖的两个进一步的理想化。首先是理想化人们的审慎态度(“审慎的理想化”一节),我认为这是合理的,但很难实际应用于实践中。第二个是理想化人们完全自私的想法(“自私自利的理想化”一节)。我不认为这是合理的理想化,因为它忽略了利他主义和公民权原则,这似乎与正义理论息息相关。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号