首页> 外文期刊>Harvard Theological Review >Named Testimonia to the Gospel of Thomas: An Expanded Inventory and Analysis*
【24h】

Named Testimonia to the Gospel of Thomas: An Expanded Inventory and Analysis*

机译:命名为托马斯福音的见证:扩展的清单和分析*

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The question of how much apocryphal Gospels were rebutted, suppressed or even destroyed in antiquity is a question of perennial interest, both popular and scholarly. The present article makes no attempt at any sort of complete answer to this question, but has the rather more modest aim of analyzing the various testimonia—from antiquity into the middle ages—that make explicit reference to a “Gospel of Thomas.” This article will not touch on the numerous allusions to, or quotations of, the contents of this Gospel, but will be confined to treatments of the title (hence “named testimonia”). The impetus for this particular investigation is of course the presence, at the end of the second tractate of Nag Hammadi Codex II, of a colophon reading “The Gospel according to Thomas.” Given the controversial contents of this Gospel, and the equally controversial place that it occupies in scholarly reconstructions of Christian origins, Thomas's reception in antiquity has been widely discussed since the discovery of the Nag Hammadi Codices (see n. 2 below).
机译:在古代反驳,压制甚至摧毁多少福音书的问题是一个长期存在的问题,无论是流行的还是学术的。本文没有试图对这个问题做出任何形式的完整答案,而是以比较适度的目标来分析从古代到中世纪的各种证词,这些证词明确提及“托马斯福音”。本文将不涉及对本福音书内容的大量引用或引用,而应仅限于标题的处理(因此称为“证言”)。这项特定调查的动力当然是在纳格·哈马迪抄本II的第二部分末尾出现了一个字样,上面写着“托马斯的福音”。考虑到这本福音书的争议性内容,以及它在基督教起源的学术重构中所占据的同样争议性的位置,自纳格·哈马迪抄本(Nag Hammadi Codices)被发现以来,托马斯在古代的接受受到了广泛讨论(见下文第2条)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Harvard Theological Review》 |2012年第1期|p.53-89|共37页
  • 作者

    Simon Gathercolea1;

  • 作者单位

    a1 University of Cambridge;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:04:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号