首页> 外文期刊>Group decision and negotiation >Can Chinese Discuss Conflicts Openly? Field and Experimental Studies of Face Dynamics in China
【24h】

Can Chinese Discuss Conflicts Openly? Field and Experimental Studies of Face Dynamics in China

机译:中国人可以公开讨论冲突吗?中国人脸动力学领域与实验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Chinese people have been theorized to be particularly sensitive to social face and avoid direct discussion in conflict to promote interpersonal harmony. Social face has been used to explain the proclivity of East Asians to smooth over conflict. More research is needed to study social face empirically and its relationship with direct discussion and the processes by which social face has its impact. Results from a field interview study and an experiment conducted in China support theorizing that confirmation of face induces cooperative goals and open-mindedness. In contrast with common assumptions about Chinese organizations, direct discussion, compared to avoiding, strengthened relationships. Direct controversy, especially when face was confirmed, induced open-mindedness: Participants asked more questions, explored the opposing views, demonstrated more knowledge of the opposing arguments, and worked to integrate views. These results were interpreted as suggesting that Chinese people can discuss their conflicts directly and cooperatively when they are assured that their face is confirmed. Results have implications both for the general theory of cooperation and competition as well as our understanding of social face in China.
机译:从理论上讲,中国人对社会面孔特别敏感,避免在冲突中进行直接讨论以促进人际和谐。社会面孔已被用来解释东亚人为解决冲突而倾向的倾向。需要进行更多的研究以实证研究社会面孔及其与直接讨论的关系以及社会面孔产生影响的过程。现场访谈研究的结果和在中国进行的一项实验支持的理论是,确认面部表情可以激发合作目标和开放性。与关于中国组织的普遍假设相反,相比于避免,加强关系,直接讨论。直接争议,尤其是当确认面孔后,引发了豁达的态度:参与者提出了更多的问题,探索了反对的观点,展示了对反对论点的更多了解,并努力整合了观点。这些结果被解释为表明,当中国人民确信自己的脸孔被证实后,可以直接和合作地讨论他们的冲突。结果对合作与竞争的一般理论以及我们对中国社会面貌的理解都具有启示意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号