...
首页> 外文期刊>Global trade and customs journal >Appellate Body Report in China: Rare Earths - Addressing Violations of WTO-Plus Obligations
【24h】

Appellate Body Report in China: Rare Earths - Addressing Violations of WTO-Plus Obligations

机译:中国上诉机构报告:稀土-解决违反WTO义务的情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Appellate Body has once again rejected the ability of China, a recently acceded World Trade Organization (WTO) Member, to have recourse to Article XX of the GATT 1994 to justify a violation of a WTO-plus obligation. It emphasized that even an express textual reference to Article XX in the relevant provision in an Accession Protocol is not dispositive as to whether an Article XX defence is available to that Member to justify a breach of a WTO-plus obligation. Rather, that determination must be conducted on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the text and context of the relevant provisions in the Accession Protocol, the agreements in the WTO legal framework, and the nature of the obligation at issue. This latest report in the trilogy of cases suggests that it will be extremely difficult for a recently acceded Member to have recourse to a general exception to justify a violation of a WTO-plus obligation.
机译:上诉机构再次拒绝了中国(最近加入世界贸易组织(WTO)成员)有能力诉诸GATT 1994第XX条来为违反WTO义务的行为辩护。它强调,即使在加入议定书的相关条款中明确提及第二十条,也不能决定该成员是否可以使用第二十条抗辩理由来证明违反世贸组织+义务。相反,该决定必须根据具体情况进行,并考虑到《加入议定书》中有关规定的文本和背景,世贸组织法律框架中的协定以及所涉义务的性质。这份关于案件三部曲的最新报告表明,对于新加入的成员而言,要诉诸一般性例外以证明违反世贸组织+义务是合理的,将是极其困难的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号