首页> 外文期刊>Global trade and customs journal >Fair Comparison, Objective Examination and Positive Evidence in Undercutting Margins Computed in EU Trade Defence Investigation? No, Thanks
【24h】

Fair Comparison, Objective Examination and Positive Evidence in Undercutting Margins Computed in EU Trade Defence Investigation? No, Thanks

机译:在欧盟贸易防御调查中削弱利润率的公平比较,客观审查和积极证据?不,谢谢

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In recent years, the European Commission has changed its practice of assessing price undercutting in trade defence investigations where the exporter sells via related sales subsidiaries. In such cases, undercutting was calculated on the basis of a 'constructed export price', obtained by deducting selling, general and administrative costs and notional profits from the actual export price. This practice was successfully challenged in Case T-301/16 Jindal v. Commission, where the General Court found that the European Commission had failed to compare prices at the same level of trade. The General Court also highlighted the importance of calculating undercutting on the basis of the actual prices charged to the first independent buyers.
机译:近年来,欧洲委员会改变了评估在出口商通过相关销售子公司销售的贸易防御调查削弱价格的实践。在这种情况下,削弱是根据“建造出口价格”计算的,通过扣除实际出口价格的销售,一般和行政费用和名义利润而获得。这种做法在T-301/16 jindal诉讼中成功地挑战。委员会,一般法院发现欧洲委员会未能比较同等贸易水平的价格。一般法院还强调了计算削减削弱的基础上的削弱,以获得第一个独立买家的实际价格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号