...
首页> 外文期刊>Global Society >Lost in Translation? Domesticating Global Policy on Genetically Modified Organisms: Comparing India and China
【24h】

Lost in Translation? Domesticating Global Policy on Genetically Modified Organisms: Comparing India and China

机译:迷失了翻译?本土化转基因生物全球政策:印度和中国的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article compares the way in which China and India, two leading developing countries in the global debate on biotechnology, have sought to translate policy commitments contained in international agreements on trade and biosafety into workable national policy. It is a complex story of selective interpretation, conflict over priorities and politicking at the highest levels of government. It connects the micro-politics of inter-bureaucratic turf wars with the diplomacy of inter-state negotiations and coalition building. Empirically, the article provides the first systematic comparison of patterns of implementation in the two countries based on extensive fieldwork, contributing to debates about biotechnology regulation and the extent to which developing countries can exercise policy autonomy in a global environment of high commercial interest and aggressive political lobbying. Conceptually, the article develops thinking about the interaction and non-linear relationship between “domestic” and “international” policy-making arenas and does so in a way which is sensitive to the key role of non-state actors in this field.
机译:本文比较了全球生物技术辩论中的两个主要发展中国家中国和印度试图将贸易和生物安全国际协定中包含的政策承诺转化为可行的国家政策的方式。这是一个复杂的故事,涉及选择性解释,优先事项之间的冲突以及政府最高层的政治活动。它把官僚之间草皮战争的微观政治与国家间谈判和联盟建设的外交联系在一起。从经验上讲,本文首次基于广泛的实地调查对这两种国家的执行模式进行了系统的比较,这有助于就生物技术法规以及发展中国家在具有高度商业利益和激进政治的全球环境中可以在何种程度上行使政策自主权进行辩论。游说。从概念上讲,本文对“国内”和“国际”决策领域之间的相互作用和非线性关系进行了思考,并以对非国家行为者在该领域的关键作用敏感的方式进行了思考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号