首页> 外文期刊>Global Society >Which Cosmopolitanism? Whose Empire? Or Why the Schmittian Charge of “Liberal Imperialism” is Only Half Right
【24h】

Which Cosmopolitanism? Whose Empire? Or Why the Schmittian Charge of “Liberal Imperialism” is Only Half Right

机译:哪种世界主义?谁的帝国?还是为什么施密特对“自由帝国主义”的指控只有一半正确

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines the Schmittian-inspired charge that liberalism is intrinsically imperialistic and that it dehumanises alternative illiberal political projects in ways that lead to disproportionate and indiscriminate violence. It focuses specifically on the charge that the US war on terror is the latest manifestation of this kind of liberal imperialism. Such an argument only makes sense when liberalism is combined with exclusionary modes of nationalism and realism. This synthesis underpins the “hard Wilsonianism” of American neoconservatism. The article argues that the Schmittian-inspired charge of imperialism cannot be properly directed at the more inclusionary cosmopolitan forms of liberalism, which is illustrated with reference to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
机译:本文探讨了施密特(Schmittian)的指控,即自由主义本质上是帝国主义的,并且以导致不成比例和不加区别的暴力行为的方式使另类的自由政治项目非人道化。它专门针对以下指控:美国反恐战争是这种自由帝国主义的最新体现。只有当自由主义与民族主义和现实主义的排他性模式相结合时,这种说法才有意义。这种综合支撑了美国新保守主义的“硬威尔逊主义”。文章认为,施密特主义对帝国主义的指控不能正确地针对更具包容性的世界主义形式的自由主义,这一点可以参考《国际刑事法院罗马规约》加以说明。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号