...
首页> 外文期刊>Global public health >Okukkera Ng'omuzungu (lost in translation): Understanding the social value of global health research for HIV/AIDS research participants in Uganda
【24h】

Okukkera Ng'omuzungu (lost in translation): Understanding the social value of global health research for HIV/AIDS research participants in Uganda

机译:Okukkera Ng'omuzungu(未翻译):了解全球健康研究对乌干达艾滋病毒/艾滋病研究参与者的社会价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As major global governance entities begin to re-assess the structure and goals of health research in resource-poor settings, social science can make a vital contribution by expanding the traditional field of research ethics to include new concepts such as the social value of global health research. This essay recasts the definition of social value in health research by shifting away from the official spaces where research occurs and towards the meaning of research as it is produced in the everyday spaces inhabited by the local community. We present three cases that reveal the local view of the social value of health research for Ugandans: autonomy and consent; the concept of risk; and what appears to be a classic case of therapeutic misconception between researcher and informant. Ultimately what we see, we argue, is the fundamental collision of the logic of biomedical research with the logic of local social relationships, that is, researchers perform their role as a transaction, while participants anticipate their involvement in research to be transformative. When we expand the analysis of the impact of research from the research/participant dyad to shifting community networks, we conclude that didactic models, such as the therapeutic misconception, are of limited utility for understanding the social value of global health research in resource-poor settings.
机译:随着主要的全球治理实体开始重新评估资源贫乏地区的卫生研究的结构和目标,社会科学可以通过扩大传统的研究伦理领域以纳入新概念(例如全球卫生的社会价值)做出重要贡献。研究。本文通过从发生研究的官方空间转向在当地社区居住的日常空间中产生的研究意义,来重塑健康研究中社会价值的定义。我们提出了三个案例,这些案例揭示了当地对乌干达人的健康研究的社会价值的看法:自治和同意;风险的概念;研究人员和线人之间似乎存在治疗误解的经典案例。我们认为,归根结底,我们看到的是生物医学研究的逻辑与当地社会关系的逻辑的根本冲突,即研究人员作为交易来履行其职责,而参与者则期望他们对研究的参与具有变革性。当我们将研究的影响从研究/参与者二元扩展到不断变化的社区网络时,我们得出的结论是,诸如治疗性误解之类的教学模型对于理解资源贫乏的全球卫生研究的社会价值的作用有限。设置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号