...
首页> 外文期刊>Global public health >'... in the project they really care for us': Meaning and experiences of participating in a clinical study of first-line treatment for malaria and HIV in Tanzanian adults
【24h】

'... in the project they really care for us': Meaning and experiences of participating in a clinical study of first-line treatment for malaria and HIV in Tanzanian adults

机译:'...在项目中,他们真正关心我们':参与坦桑尼亚成年人疟疾和HIV一线治疗临床研究的意义和经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Critiques of biomedical research in low-resource settings typically centre on clinical trials and the 'dissymmetries of power' between the researched and those benefiting from the products of research. It is important to extend this critical lens to other forms of global health research. We conducted a qualitative study in Tanzania to explore meaning and experiences of participating in a clinical observational study evaluating the safety and efficacy of current practice for treating HIV and malaria co-infection. Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews were undertaken with 124 study participants, study staff and health workers. Participants' understanding of the study's research aims was limited, but the practice of participation - engaging with research staff and materials -appeared to facilitate interpretations of the study's value, conceptualised as a 'service'. For those peripheral to the study, however, interpretations of it reflected existing suspicions of experimental research. Our findings indicate the importance of considering the expectations, roles and responsibilities constructed through the practice of participation in different types of research, and how they relate to legacies of research. Understanding how networks of research practice intersect local social and historical contexts can extend discussions of collaboration and engagement with research in low-resource settings.
机译:在资源匮乏的环境中,对生物医学研究的批判通常集中在临床试验以及研究人员与受益于研究产品的人员之间的“权力不对称”。重要的是将这一重要的视角扩展到其他形式的全球卫生研究。我们在坦桑尼亚进行了定性研究,以探索参与临床观察研究的意义和经验,该研究评估了当前治疗HIV和疟疾共感染的安全性和有效性。与124位研究参与者,研究人员和卫生工作者进行了焦点小组讨论和深入访谈。参与者对研究目标的理解是有限的,但是参与实践(与研究人员和材料互动)似乎有助于解释研究的价值,将其概念化为“服务”。然而,对于那些研究的外围人士,对它的解释反映了对实验研究的现有怀疑。我们的发现表明,考虑通过参与不同类型的研究实践而构筑的期望,角色和责任的重要性,以及它们与研究遗产之间的关系。了解研究实践的网络如何与当地社会和历史背景相交,可以扩展关于资源匮乏地区的研究合作与参与的讨论。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Global public health 》 |2013年第6期| 670-684| 共15页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK;

    National Institute for Medical Research, Amani Medical Research Centre, Muheza, Tanzania;

    National Institute for Medical Research, Tanga Medical Research Centre, Tanga, Tanzania;

    Centre for Medical Parasitology at Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark ,Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen K, Denmark;

    Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Tanzania; research ethics; research participation; health care provision; low-income country;

    机译:坦桑尼亚;研究伦理;研究参与;卫生保健;低收入国家;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号