...
首页> 外文期刊>Global Journal of Business Research >ECONOMIC GOALS RANKING APPROACH INCOMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC SYSTEMS
【24h】

ECONOMIC GOALS RANKING APPROACH INCOMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC SYSTEMS

机译:经济系统比较分析中的经济目标排序方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Three main economic systems that have coexisted during last 100 years: pure market, pure command, and mixed economies, have the same mission: to satisfy unlimited human needs and wants using a set of limited economic resources. Each of them is pursuing the same major economic goals: economic efficiency, economic growth, economic stability, economic equality and economic self-sufficiency. But these systems are very different. One reason why they are different, in our opinion, is the difference in the priorities and ranking order of these five major economic goals. This ranking order is different for every system. As a result, each system has established its own economic structure, has determined its own role for the government, and has used a different strategy for its function and economic development. In this paper I will compare the correlation of the perceived priorities in the ranking orders of economic goals of selected countries of the world: USA, China, Russia and Costa Rica, with ranking orders of so-called "pure" market, "pure" command, and "ideal" mixed economies using the Kendall rank correlation coefficient as the instrument for measuring the correlation between "ideal" orders and perceived real orders of economic goals.
机译:过去100年中并存的三个主要经济体系:纯市场,纯命令和混合经济具有相同的使命:满足人类无限的需求,并希望使用有限的经济资源。他们每个人都追求相同的主要经济目标:经济效率,经济增长,经济稳定,经济平等和经济自给自足。但是这些系统有很大的不同。我们认为,它们之所以不同,一个原因是这五个主要经济目标的优先顺序和排名顺序不同。每个系统的排名顺序都不同。结果,每个系统都建立了自己的经济结构,确定了自己的政府角色,并针对其功能和经济发展采用了不同的策略。在本文中,我将比较世界某些国家(美国,中国,俄罗斯和哥斯达黎加)的经济目标排名顺序中感知优先级的相关性与所谓“纯”市场,“纯”市场的排名顺序之间的相关性。命令和“理想”混合经济体,使用肯德尔等级相关系数作为衡量经济目标的“理想”阶次与感知的实际阶次之间的相关性的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号