...
首页> 外文期刊>Global and planetary change >Forced or normal regression signals in a lacustrine basin? Insights from 3D stratigraphic forward modeling in the SW Pannonian Basin
【24h】

Forced or normal regression signals in a lacustrine basin? Insights from 3D stratigraphic forward modeling in the SW Pannonian Basin

机译:在湖泊盆地中强制或正常的回归信号? SW Pannonian盆地3D地层向前建模见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The overall geometry of sedimentary basins is driven by a complex interplay between subsidence, water-level variations, sedimentation rates and basin-margin topography. Seaward movement of the shoreline is driven by either high sediment input or by base-level drop. The influence of the specific driving mechanisms is often overwritten by subsequent burial and compaction effects or it is below the resolution of observational data. Our main aim is to describe and discuss the influence of these internal and external forcing factors and demonstrate their sedimentary response, particularly the related unconformities and clinoform geometries in a deep lacustrine setting. To this aim, 3D numerical simulations were performed using DionisosFlow stratigraphic forward modeling software. Models are constrained by seismic and well data from the Drava Basin part of the SW Pannonian Basin, Central Europe. A wide range of parameters, such as subsidence rates, lake-level curves and sedimentation rates were compared and analyzed. Post-rift subsidence and inversion of the basin have been simulated together with the main sedimentary transport routes. Our calculation infers that paleo-water depth could have reached ca. 1300 m in the deepest parts of the basin. Furthermore, our models show that differential compaction, subsidence and lateral variations of the sediment supply result in apparently descending shelf-edge trajectories and onlapping clinoform surfaces that are often misinterpreted as base-level drops. By analyzing the sedimentary response to different climatic variations, we argue that there is no direct indication of a major base-level drop in the Drava Basin, which was much larger than the seismic resolution, i.e. 40-50 m. Modeling also infers that autoretreat and autocyclic variations are more effective at low sediment supply and higher amplitude lake-level variations.
机译:沉积盆的整体几何形状由沉降,水位变化,沉积率和盆地边缘地形之间的复杂相互作用驱动。海岸线的海洋运动由高沉积物输入或基础级下降驱动。特定驱动机制的影响通常由后续埋葬和压缩效果覆盖,否则它低于观察数据的分辨率。我们的主要目标是描述和讨论这些内部和外部迫使因素的影响,并展示其沉积反应,特别是在深层湖泊环境中的相关无关和临床族几何形状。为此目的,使用Dionisosflow Stratibraphic向前建模软件进行3D数值模拟。模型受到中欧SW Pannonian盆地的Drava盆地部分的地震和井数据的限制。比较和分析了各种参数,如临时速度,湖泊曲线和沉降率。盆地的后裂滞沉降和倒流已经与主要沉积运输路线一起模拟。我们的计算是古水深可能已达到CA.盆地最深部分的1300米。此外,我们的模型表明,沉积物供应的差分压实,沉降和横向变化导致明显下降的搁板边缘轨迹和展开临床临床表面,其经常被误解为基础级滴。通过分析对不同气候变化的沉积反应,我们认为DRAVA盆地中没有直接指示,这远远大于地震分辨率,即40-50米。建模还患有自身物质和高环变化在低沉积物供应和较高幅度湖泊水平变化中更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号