首页> 外文期刊>Global and planetary change >Continental-scale patterns and climatic drivers of fruiting phenology: A quantitative Neotropical review
【24h】

Continental-scale patterns and climatic drivers of fruiting phenology: A quantitative Neotropical review

机译:结果性物候的大陆尺度模式和气候驱动因素:新热带定量研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Changes in the life cycle of organisms (i.e. phenology) are one of the most widely used early-warning indicators of climate change, yet this remains poorly understood throughout the tropics. We exhaustively reviewed any published and unpublished study on fruiting phenology carried out at the community level in the American tropics and subtropics (latitudinal range: 26 degrees N-26 degrees S) to (1) provide a comprehensive overview of the current status of fruiting phenology research throughout the Neotropics; (2) unravel the climatic factors that have been widely reported as drivers of fruiting phenology; and (3) provide a preliminary assessment of the potential phenological responses of plants under future climatic scenarios. Despite the large number of phenological datasets uncovered (218), our review shows that their geographic distribution is very uneven and insufficient for the large surface of the Neotropics (similar to 1 dataset per similar to 78,000 km(2)). Phenological research is concentrated in few areas with many studies (state of Sfio Paulo, Brazil, and Costa Rica), whereas vast regions elsewhere are entirely unstudied. Sampling effort in fruiting phenology studies was generally low: the majority of datasets targeted fewer than 100 plant species (71%), lasted 2 years or less (72%), and only 10.4% monitored >15 individuals per species. We uncovered only 10 sites with ten or more years of phenological monitoring. The ratio of numbers of species sampled to overall estimates of plant species richness was wholly insufficient for highly diverse vegetation types such as tropical rainforest, seasonal forest and cerrado, and only slightly more robust for less diverse vegetation types, such as deserts, arid shrublands and open grassy savannas. Most plausible drivers of phenology extracted from these datasets were environmental (78.5%), whereas biotic drivers were rare (6%). Among climatic factors, rainfall was explicitly included in 73.4% of cases, followed by air temperature (19.3%). Other environmental cues such as water level (6%), solar radiation or photoperiod (3.2%), and ENSO events (1.4%) were rarely addressed. In addition, drivers were analyzed statistically in only 38% of datasets and techniques were basically correlative, with only 4.8% of studies including any consideration of the inherently autocorrelated character of phenological time series. Fruiting peaks were significantly more often reported during the rainy season both in rainforests and cerrado woodlands, which is at odds with the relatively aseasonal character of the former vegetation type. Given that climatic models predict harsh future conditions for the tropics, we urgently need' to determine the magnitude of changes in plant reproductive phenology and distinguish those from cyclical oscillations. Longterm monitoring and herbarium data are therefore key for detecting these trends. Our review shows that the unevenness in geographic distribution of studies, and diversity of sampling methods, vegetation types, and research motivation hinder the emergence of clear general phenological patterns and drivers for the Neotropics. We therefore call for prioritizing research in unexplored areas, and improving the quantitative component and statistical design of reproductive phenology studies to enhance our predictions of climate change impacts on tropical plants and animals. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:生物生命周期的变化(即物候学)是气候变化使用最广泛的预警指标之一,但在整个热带地区,人们对此仍然知之甚少。我们详尽地回顾了美洲热带和亚热带地区(纬度范围:南纬26度至南纬26度)在社区一级进行的关于水果物候研究的任何已发表和未发表的研究,以(1)全面概述了水果物候研究的现状。整个新热带地区的研究; (2)揭露被广泛报道为结果物候学驱动因素的气候因素; (3)对未来气候情景下植物的潜在物候响应进行初步评估。尽管未发现大量的物候数据集(218),但我们的审查显示,它们的地理分布非常不均匀,对于新热带地区的大表面而言不足(类似于1个数据集,相当于78,000 km(2))。物候学研究集中在很少有很多研究的领域(圣保罗州,巴西和哥斯达黎加),而其他地方的广大地区则完全未被研究。结果性物候研究的抽样工作通常很低:大多数数据集的目标对象是少于100种植物(占71%),历时2年或更短时间(占72%),只有10.4%的监测对象超过15个个体。我们仅发现了10个进行了10年或更长时间的物候监测的站点。对于高度多样化的植被类型(例如热带雨林,季节性森林和塞拉多)而言,采样的物种数量与植物物种丰富度的总体估计之比完全不足,而对于较少多样性的植被类型(例如沙漠,干旱灌木丛和植被)而言,抽样物种的比例仅稍强一些。打开草地的稀树草原。从这些数据集中提取的最可能的物候驱动因素是环境的(78.5%),而生物驱动因素则很少(6%)。在气候因素中,有73.4%的病例明确包括降雨,其次是气温(19.3%)。很少解决其他环境提示,例如水位(6%),太阳辐射或光周期(3.2%)和ENSO事件(1.4%)。此外,仅对38%的数据集进行了驱动程序的统计分析,并且技术基本相关,只有4.8%的研究包括对物候时间序列固有的自相关特征的任何考虑。在雨林和塞拉多林地中,雨季的果期高峰报告频率明显更高,这与前一种植被类型的相对季节性特征不符。鉴于气候模型预测了热带地区未来的严峻条件,我们迫切需要确定植物繁殖物候变化的幅度,并将其与周期性波动区分开来。因此,长期监测和植物标本室数据是检测这些趋势的关键。我们的综述表明,研究地理分布的不均匀性,采样方法的多样性,植被类型和研究动机阻碍了新热带主义者出现清晰的一般物候模式和动因。因此,我们呼吁优先考虑未开发地区的研究,并改进生殖物候研究的定量组成和统计设计,以增强我们对气候变化对热带动植物影响的预测。 (C)2016 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号