首页> 外文期刊>Geotechnical and Geological Engineering >Comparison of Numerical Formulations for Two-phase Flow in Porous Media
【24h】

Comparison of Numerical Formulations for Two-phase Flow in Porous Media

机译:多孔介质中两相流数值公式的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Numerical approximation based on different forms of the governing partial differential equation can lead to significantly different results for two-phase flow in porous media. Selecting the proper primary variables is a critical step in efficiently modeling the highly nonlinear problem of multiphase subsurface flow. A comparison of various forms of numerical approximations for two-phase flow equations is performed in this work. Three forms of equations including the pressure-based, mixed pressure–saturation and modified pressure–saturation are examined. Each of these three highly nonlinear formulations is approximated using finite difference method and is linearized using both Picard and Newton–Raphson linearization approaches. Model simulations for several test cases demonstrate that pressure based form provides better results compared to the pressure–saturation approach in terms of CPU_time and the number of iterations. The modification of pressure–saturation approach improves accuracy of the results. Also it is shown that the Newton–Raphson linearization approach performed better in comparison to the Picard iteration linearization approach with the exception for in the pressure–saturation form.
机译:基于控制偏微分方程不同形式的数值逼近可导致多孔介质中两相流的结果明显不同。选择合适的主要变量是有效建模多相地下流动的高度非线性问题的关键步骤。在这项工作中,对两相流方程的各种形式的数值逼近进行了比较。研究了三种形式的方程,包括基于压力的方程,混合压力-饱和度和修正的压力-饱和度。这三种高度非线性的公式均使用有限差分法进行近似,并使用Picard和Newton-Raphson线性化方法进行线性化。针对多个测试案例的模型仿真表明,与压力饱和方法相比,基于压力的形式在CPU_time和迭代次数方面提供了更好的结果。修改压力饱和方法可提高结果的准确性。还表明,与牛顿-拉普森线性化方法相比,皮卡德迭代线性化方法表现更好,但压力饱和形式除外。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号