首页> 外文期刊>Geosynthetics International >Scaled model tests on influence factors of full geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankments
【24h】

Scaled model tests on influence factors of full geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankments

机译:土工合成纤维增强桩支护路堤影响因素的比例模型试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported (GRPS) embankment that consists of embankment fill, geosynthetic, piles, and foundation soils is a complex soil-structure system. Its key load transfer mechanisms include soil arching and tensioned membrane effects and subsoil resistance. Type of embankment fill (cohesive or cohesionless) and type of pile (end-bearing or floating) are expected to affect these load transfer mechanisms; however, their influence has not been well investigated. Six scaled model tests were conducted in this study to investigate the influence of the embankment fill properties, the clear spacing of pile caps, and the pile type on soil arching and tensioned membrane effects. This study used cohesive and cohesionless embankment fills and end-bearing and floating piles. The test results show that the cohesive embankment fill strengthened the soil-arching effect, increased the pile efficacy, and reduced the settlements of the subsoil between pile caps and the embankment crest under the same load as compared with the cohesionless embankment fill. The soil arching-effect was inversely proportional to the clear spacing of pile caps. Soil arching initiated at a low ratio of the embankment height to the clear spacing of pile caps (i.e. 0.5 to 0.7) and became stable at a higher ratio (i.e. 1.1 to 1.5). The embankment height when the soil arching becomes stable is also referred to as the critical height, at which full soil arching is formed. The measured vertical earth pressures at the edges of the pile caps were higher than those in the middle of the pile caps in all six model tests. When the end-bearing or floating piles were used, the loads on the piles (i.e. the pile efficacy) increased during the construction of the embankment. However, when the floating piles started to penetrate into the underlying soil under a higher load; the pile efficacy decreased with the embankment and the surcharge load. Floating piles resulted in less soil arching and larger settlement.
机译:由路堤填土,土工合成材料,桩和基础土组成的土工合成纤维增强桩支撑(GRPS)路堤是一个复杂的土壤结构系统。其关键的荷载传递机制包括土拱效应和张拉膜效应以及地下抗力。预计路堤填土的类型(粘结或无粘结)和桩的类型(端承或浮动)会影响这些荷载传递机制。但是,他们的影响尚未得到很好的调查。在这项研究中进行了六个比例模型测试,以研究路堤填充特性,桩帽的净间距以及桩类型对土拱和张拉膜效应的影响。这项研究使用了有粘性和无粘性的路堤填充物以及端承和浮桩。试验结果表明,与无黏性路堤填充相比,在相同荷载下,黏性路堤填充增强了土拱效应,提高了桩效,并减少了桩帽与路堤顶之间的底土沉降。土拱效应与桩帽的净间距成反比。土拱起于较低的路堤高度与桩帽的净间距(即0.5至0.7)之比,并在较高的比率(即1.1至1.5)时稳定。土拱稳定时的路堤高度也称为临界高度,在该高度处形成完整的土拱。在所有六个模型测试中,在桩帽边缘测得的垂直土压力均高于在桩帽中间的垂直土压力。当使用端承或浮动桩时,在筑筑路堤期间,桩上的载荷(即桩效)增加。但是,当浮动桩在较高的载荷下开始渗透到下面的土壤中时;桩效随路堤和超载而降低。漂浮的桩导致较少的土壤拱形和较大的沉降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号