首页> 外文期刊>Geomorphology >Comparison Of Flood Hazard Assessments On Desert Piedmonts And Playas: A Case Study In Ivanpah Valley, Nevada
【24h】

Comparison Of Flood Hazard Assessments On Desert Piedmonts And Playas: A Case Study In Ivanpah Valley, Nevada

机译:沙漠山麓和普拉亚斯洪水灾害评估的比较:以内华达州伊万帕谷为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Accurate and realistic characterizations of flood hazards on desert piedmonts and playas are increasingly important given the rapid urbanization of arid regions. Flood behavior in arid fluvial systems differs greatly from that of the perennial rivers upon which most conventional flood hazard assessment methods are based. Additionally, hazard assessments may vary widely between studies or even contradict other maps. This study's chief objective was to compare and evaluate landscape interpretation and hazard assessment between types of maps depicting assessments of flood risk in Ivanpah Valley, NV, as a case study. As a secondary goal, we explain likely causes of discrepancy between data sets to ameliorate confusion for map users. Four maps, including three different flood hazard assessments of Ivanpah Valley, NV, were compared: (ⅰ) a regulatory map prepared by FEMA, (ⅱ) a soil survey map prepared by NRCS, (ⅲ) a surficial geologic map, and (ⅳ) a flood hazard map derived from the surficial geologic map, both of which were prepared by NBMG. GIS comparisons revealed that only 3.4% (33.9 km~2) of Ivanpah Valley was found to lie within a FEMA floodplain, while the geologic flood hazard map indicated that ~44% of Ivanpah Valley runs some risk of flooding (Fig. 2D). Due to differences in mapping methodology and scale, NRCS data could not be quantitatively compared, and other comparisons were complicated by differences in flood hazard class criteria and terminology between maps. Owing to its scale and scope of attribute data, the surficial geologic map provides the most useful information on flood hazards for land-use planning. This research has implications for future soil geomorphic mapping and flood risk mitigation on desert piedmonts and playas. The Ivanpah Valley study area also includes the location of a planned new international airport, thus this study has immediate implications for urban development and land-use planning near Las Vegas, NV.
机译:鉴于干旱地区的快速城市化,准确,现实地表征沙漠山麓和海滨地区的洪灾危害越来越重要。干旱河流系统的洪水行为与大多数常规洪水灾害评估方法所依据的多年生河流的行为有很大不同。此外,研究之间的危害评估可能相差甚远,甚至与其他地图相矛盾。这项研究的主要目的是比较和评估在描述内华达州伊万帕谷洪水风险评估的地图类型之间的景观解释和危害评估,作为案例研究。作为次要目标,我们解释了数据集之间差异的可能原因,以减轻地图用户的困惑。比较了四张地图,包括内华达州伊凡帕谷的三种不同的洪水灾害评估:(ⅰ)由FEMA制作的管制图,(ⅱ)NRCS制作的土壤调查图,(ⅲ)浅层地质图,和(ⅳ )由地表地质图得出的洪水灾害图,两者均由NBMG制作。 GIS的比较表明,在FEMA洪泛区内仅发现了3.4%(33.9 km〜2)的伊万帕河谷,而地质洪水灾害图表明,约有44%的伊万帕河谷存在一定的洪灾风险(图2D)。由于制图方法和规模的差异,无法对NRCS数据进行定量比较,而其他比较则由于洪水灾害等级标准和地图术语之间的差异而变得比较复杂。由于其属性数据的规模和范围,表面地质图为土地利用规划提供了有关洪水灾害的最有用信息。这项研究对未来土壤地貌测绘和减轻沙漠山前和滩涂的洪水风险具有重要意义。伊万帕谷研究区还包括计划中的新国际机场的位置,因此该研究对内华达州拉斯维加斯附近的城市发展和土地利用规划具有直接影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号