...
首页> 外文期刊>Geographical Research >The Future of the Murray River: Amenity Re-Considered?
【24h】

The Future of the Murray River: Amenity Re-Considered?

机译:墨累河的未来:是否重新考虑过便利设施?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Most efforts to restore environmental flows to the Murray River assume that it means resolving a dilemma between two competing needs: those of the environment and those of agriculturalists. This paper provides evidence to show amenity is also important, it is not being adequately considered, and that this, in turn, is impeding efforts to restore environmental flows. The paper contains a literature review of a number of studies which, when combined, show that the importance of amenity (tourism, recreation and lifestyle) is of similar scale (has significant economic value and community support) to productive values. Three case studies show that community concerns about loss of amenity values have impeded restoration programs despite evidence that existing practices are causing environmental damage. The debate about water use in the Murray is clearly not simply one between environment and production but also one involving lifestyles. The challenge is to better understand the nature and scale of amenity and its relationship to other natural resource management issues.
机译:恢复流向墨累河的环境的大多数努力都假定这意味着要解决两个相互竞争的需求之间的困境:环境需求和农业需求。本文提供的证据表明,舒适性也很重要,没有得到足够的考虑,而这反过来又阻碍了恢复环境流量的努力。本文包含对许多研究的文献综述,这些研究综合起来表明,舒适性(旅游,娱乐和生活方式)的重要性与生产价值具有相似的规模(具有重大的经济价值和社区支持)。三个案例研究表明,尽管有证据表明现有做法正在造成环境破坏,但社区对便利设施价值下降的担忧已阻碍了恢复计划。默里关于用水的争论显然不仅是环境与生产之间的争论,而且还涉及生活方式。面临的挑战是如何更好地了解便利设施的性质和规模及其与其他自然资源管理问题的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号